Teams

FD 7.0 BR Timken

2025 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 7.0 LT Fiedler902439166
2FD 7.0 NC1 Bullach9023410152
3FD 7.0 MM1 Mei7120411158
4FD 7.0 MV1 Connell53141024198
5FD 7.0 NC2 Williams54161124210
6FD 7.0 PM2 Nita54151232245
7FD 7.0 AO Pecko4491536242
8FD 7.0 CC Meisenbach45141332257
9FD 7.0 BR Timken45101738271
10FD 7.0 MV2 Jolibois35121226181
11FD 7.0 MM2 Wachspress1751938239
12FD 7.0 PM1 Leohr0942347296
13FD 7.0 TP Voris0922552310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Michael Klapchar
published
3.50
Brian Hass
published 4
3.34
Nathaniel Brahler
published
3.25
David Brubach
published 3.5
3.18
Drew Swallen
published
3.11
Kimberly Klapchar
published
3.11
David Tsai
published 3
3.10
Francie Morrow
published
3.05
Fred Zalenski
published
3.03
Robert Timken
published
2.96
Jonathan Congeni
published
2.92
Sara Timken
published
2.86
Joey Hass
published
2.82
Traci Tsai
published
2.81
Katie Wernow
published
2.79
Kristin Zalenski
published
2.74
Howard Wernow
published
2.73
Rachel Brahler
published
2.63
Tiffany Ruwadi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Timken + Kristin Zalenski9954% games+15.1% vs expected
Tiffany Ruwadi + Sara Timken5257% games+14.1% vs expected
Francie Morrow + Kristin Zalenski16653% games+8.5% vs expected
Traci Tsai + Francie Morrow15754% games+6.3% vs expected
Tiffany Ruwadi + Katie Wernow10553% games+5.1% vs expected
Sara Timken + Francie Morrow9652% games+4.7% vs expected
Rachel Brahler + Katie Wernow5449% games+3.1% vs expected
Sara Timken + Rachel Brahler3449% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Klapchar
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Brian Hass
101W–59L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Nathaniel Brahler
36W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Ramesh Krishnamurthi
25W–36L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
David Brubach
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Drew Swallen
17W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Kimberly Klapchar
18W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.11
3
David Tsai
56W–87L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Francie Morrow
137W–82L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Fred Zalenski
19W–34L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Robert Timken
29W–62L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jonathan Congeni
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Sara Timken
135W–131L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Joey Hass
66W–85L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.86
Traci Tsai
110W–116L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.82
Katie Wernow
33W–38L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Kristin Zalenski
63W–72L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Howard Wernow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Rachel Brahler
46W–70L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Tiffany Ruwadi
44W–29L career · no lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.