Teams

CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/Armitage

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-24vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Ann MorfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Peltzer / Lisa Symmonds vs Sonja Lampasi / Lorna Matthew6-3, 6-4
2021-03-17vs CV-Rancho La Quina/KnodeLost 02
L#2 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs DeEtte Mountford / Janet Kerrigan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Eldredge / Judy Anderson vs Susan Parker / Bette Kerhoulas6-4, 1-4
L#2 DoublesJudy Anderson / Susan Eldredge vs Marjorie Petersen / Helen Hannaford6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Marjo Hull / Thelma Sahara6-0, 6-4
2021-03-10vs CV-La Quinta Resort/M RolstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Beverly Hovorka / Meg Maloney6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudy Anderson / Susan Eldredge vs Eileen Dill / Mary Read6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-02-24vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/RansomWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Symmonds / Tammy Peltzer vs Monica McCready / Joan Hall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Gillen / Celeste Armitage vs Diane Pickett / Nancy Closson1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJudy Anderson / Susan Eldredge vs Nancy Berryhill / Farzaneh Kia6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Celeste Armitage
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Lisa Symmonds
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Katie Buechel
published
Janice Campbell
published
Judy Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Webb
published
Melanie Ditton
published
Monica Sabo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Armitage + Janice Campbell41040% gamesnot enough data
Judy Anderson + Celeste Armitage033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Armitage
70W–83L career · 9 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lisa Symmonds
58W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.50
Katie Buechel
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
Janice Campbell
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Judy Anderson
18W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Webb
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melanie Ditton
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Monica Sabo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.