Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Fleming & Wilkinson

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-24vs CV-La Quinta Resort/M RolstonWon 10
W#1 DoublesHelen Hannaford / Marjo Hull vs Janet Gallagher / Beverly Hovorka3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-17vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/RansomWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarjo Hull / Mary Pinnow vs Nancy Berryhill / Jill Lawrence Polls6-1, 6-4
2021-03-14vs CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/ArmitageSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Petersen / Helen Hannaford vs Judy Anderson / Susan Eldredge3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarjo Hull / Thelma Sahara vs Celeste Armitage / Janice Campbell0-6, 4-6
2021-03-13vs CV-Rancho La Quina/KnodeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Thelma Sahara vs Janet Kerrigan / DeEtte Mountford6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Hannaford / Marjorie Petersen vs Brenda Williams / Kathleen Rae6-1, 6-2
2021-02-24vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Ann MorfordSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarjo Hull / Mary Pinnow vs Lorna Matthew / Kelly Diamond6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesThelma Sahara / Marjorie Petersen vs Olga Ruiz / Judi Marchand6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Maria Crema
published
3.94
Helen Hannaford
published 4
3.81
Marjo Hull
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Thelma Sahara
published
Marjorie Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Pinnow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjo Hull + Helen Hannaford8057% games+11.9% vs expected
Marjo Hull + Thelma Sahara8458% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Crema
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Helen Hannaford
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.94
Marjo Hull
129W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Thelma Sahara
12W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Marjorie Petersen
40W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Pinnow
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.