Teams

DTC #1

2023 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 3.0 MEN- 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-04vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesGary Revere / JOHN CHAMSI vs Roger Martinez / Corey Zimet2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Smith / Bruce M Floyd vs Vincent Runco / Rafael Delgado1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Paszek / Mark Saad vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-25vs SPANISH TRAILLost 03
L#1 SinglesJames Mcclary vs Brent Zeppenfeld2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Scott / Miguel Pontillas vs Brian Brancato / Scot Martin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGary Revere / JOHN CHAMSI vs Mark Tarantan / George Ralls6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-18vs NV/LENGSON/ADULT40 &OVER/M3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGary Revere / James Mcclary vs Carter Heller / Thomas Schinabeck7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Pursel vs Curtis Saludes5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Scott / Thomas Paszek vs Taylor Randolph / James Izeluk4-6, 4-6
2023-02-11vs RED ROCK CC #1Won 21
L#1 DoublesMiguel Pontillas / Mark Saad vs Dale Haines / Lance Allgower5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Pursel vs William Weber6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Mcclary / Gary Revere vs David Ordonez / Mike Baraiolo6-2, 6-3
2023-02-04vs DTC #2Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Campbell / Daniel Pursel vs Alan Hernandez Jarvis / W Iain Scott4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesGary Revere vs Josh Haldeman2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Mcclary / JOHN CHAMSI vs Fernando Prieto / Tyler Barrett2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Paszek / Andrew Smith vs Michael Gifford / Keith Brennaman0-6, 5-7
2023-01-28vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJames Mcclary vs David Ponte2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Saad / JOHN CHAMSI vs Sean Ono / Jim Olizarowicz3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Scott / Thomas Paszek vs Jack Langley / Bruce L Gale1-6, 0-6
2023-01-21vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 12
W#1 DoublesGary Revere / James Mcclary vs Abraham Taylor / Bill Bosnos7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Pursel vs Wael Eid3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Saad / Thomas Paszek vs Jeff Bader / Kevin Bianchi3-6, 4-6
2023-01-14vs SPANISH TRAILLost 12
W#1 DoublesGary Revere / James Mcclary vs Paul Marrero / Scot Martin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Paul Scott vs Jason Kuller / Donald Rubino0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Paszek / Mark Saad vs Brian Kolp / Achut Reddy7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-01-07vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesGary Revere / Thomas Paszek vs Steven Hawkes / Michael Gleason - (DQ)*1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJOHN CHAMSI / James Mcclary vs Corey Zimet / Rafael Delgado6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Smith / Bruce M Floyd vs Roger Martinez / Vincent Runco1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
James Mcclary
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.99
Gary Revere
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3
2.99
Daniel Pursel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Thomas Paszek
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
Bruce M Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Andrew Smith
published 2.5
2.17
JOHN CHAMSI
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Paul Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Saad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Miguel Pontillas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JOHN CHAMSI + Gary Revere1446% games+4.4% vs expected
Gary Revere + James Mcclary8549% games+3.3% vs expected
Thomas Paszek + Mark Saad2739% games−3.6% vs expected
Paul Scott + Bruce M Floyd0612% gamesnot enough data
Paul Scott + JOHN CHAMSI033 matchesnot enough data
Gary Revere + Thomas Paszek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Mcclary
66W–40L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
3
Gary Revere
58W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Daniel Pursel
87W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Thomas Paszek
72W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.89
2.5
Bruce M Floyd
2W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Andrew Smith
7W–40L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
JOHN CHAMSI
29W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
Paul Scott
5W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.10
Mark Saad
5W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Pontillas
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.