Teams

UPTA18S/Hochet/GTC

2025 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Men - 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-03vs UPTA18S/Joffe/ThornbladeWon 30
W#1 SinglesAdalberto Taguchi vs Jon Joffe7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesWilliam Hochet vs Baird Hull6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMarcelo Lavigne vs Andrew D'Agostino4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-25vs UPTA18S/Wise/NeelyFarmWon 30
W#1 SinglesAdalberto Taguchi vs David Allen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChulhun Park vs Zach Harrington6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEugeny Desiatnikov vs Sebastian Schneider3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs UPTA18S/Mollenkamp/ACACWon 21
W#1 SinglesMarcelo Lavigne vs Camden Adams7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAdalberto Taguchi vs Garret Conover4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWilliam Hochet vs Nils Mollenkamp5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-14vs UPTA18S/Appleby/KrocWon 21
L#1 SinglesAdalberto Taguchi vs Douglas Meagher6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWilliam Hochet vs Mitch Appleby6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMarcelo Lavigne vs Xin Huang6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs UPTA18S/Brown/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 SinglesEugeny Desiatnikov vs Kainen Leer5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMarcelo Lavigne vs Scott Mouzon6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWilliam Hochet vs David Hommes3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Chulhun Park
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.97
Adalberto Taguchi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.87
William Hochet
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.86
Marcelo Lavigne
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Eugeny Desiatnikov
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Hochet + Adalberto Taguchi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chulhun Park
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Adalberto Taguchi
34W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
William Hochet
46W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Marcelo Lavigne
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Eugeny Desiatnikov
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.