Teams

UPTA18S/Mollenkamp/ACAC

2025 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Men - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-01vs UPTA18S/Appleby/KrocLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrian Tant vs Patrick OFriel2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGarret Conover vs Douglas Meagher2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Xin Huang2-6, 4-6
2025-10-22vs UPTA18S/Russell/KrocWon 20
W#1 SinglesCamden Adams vs Drew Corontzes6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNils Mollenkamp vs Erik Russell6-0, 6-1
2025-10-18vs UPTA18S/Gray/KrocLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrian Tant vs Jackson Dozier6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNils Mollenkamp vs Hunter Gray0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesGarret Conover vs Austin DuBois1-6, 4-6
2025-10-16vs UPTA18S/Hochet/GTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesCamden Adams vs Marcelo Lavigne5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGarret Conover vs Adalberto Taguchi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNils Mollenkamp vs William Hochet7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-08vs UPTA18S/Joffe/ThornbladeWon 21
L#1 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Jon Joffe3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCamden Adams vs Harrison Christian6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Andrew D'Agostino6-3, 7-6
2025-10-04vs UPTA18S/Brown/BrookstoneWon 20
W#1 SinglesNils Mollenkamp vs Kainen Leer6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCamden Adams vs David Hommes6-3, 6-4
2025-09-23vs UPTA18S/Wise/NeelyFarmWon 30
W#1 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Mike Wise7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesGarret Conover vs Richard Gajewski6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrian Tant vs Zach Harrington6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Camden Adams
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.70
Grant Hunter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Harvinder Sidhu
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Garret Conover
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.31
Brian Tant
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.27
Nils Mollenkamp
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nils Mollenkamp + Garret Conover314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camden Adams
14W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Grant Hunter
29W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Harvinder Sidhu
48W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Garret Conover
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
4
Brian Tant
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Nils Mollenkamp
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.