Teams

NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: White/Markley

NIN FW Mixed 18 & Over · NIN FW MXD 18&0 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-04-18vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: SatherWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve White / Laura Wallstrom vs Courtney Todd / Ronnie Coleman7-6, 6-1
2026-04-17vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: ShieWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Wagner / Margaret Neese vs Abby Shie / Scott Shie6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCosimo Lombardi / Deb Hewes vs Allison Prabhu / Stephen Marks6-2, 6-0
2026-03-21vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: WeybrightWon 20
W#2 DoublesSpencer Barnes / Margaret Neese vs Ashutosh Jha / Rachel Roberts6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKayle Davis / Kathleen Markley vs Daniel Cole / Christine Hutchins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: RosalesLost 02
L#2 DoublesSea Grandon / Ryan Seale vs Jamie Rinkenberger / Charles Vu6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Wallstrom / Steve White vs Jennifer Adams / Roshan Kotian1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRyan Seale / Sea Grandon vs Cindy Friend / Tim Stauffer7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSteve White / Laura Wallstrom vs Kristine Valcarcel / Ben Eggleston6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSpencer Barnes / Natalie Pugh vs Rhonda Phillips / Michael Marietta6-4, 6-1
2026-02-21vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: ForrestWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteve White / Natalie Pugh vs Bethany Sinclair / Christopher Forrest6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Markley / Kayle Davis vs Jenny Vogt / Darren Vogt6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVijay Kamineni / Margaret Neese vs Mary Cahill / Roy Bracht6-3, 6-3
2026-02-20vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: SatherWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve White / Kathleen Markley vs Wendy Sather / Luis Loera4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-14vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: ShieWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve White / Laura Wallstrom vs Ronald Bunt / Allison Prabhu6-0, 6-2
2026-02-06vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: WeybrightSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRyan Seale / Amy Hoover vs Doug Nolt / Ley Nikitin6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Wagner / Margaret Neese vs Sean Lape / Jill Ellison4-6, 4-6
2026-01-31vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: RosalesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaura Wallstrom / Steve White vs Michelle Saraiva / Roshan Kotian6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathleen Markley / Kayle Davis vs Nina Levenda / Charles Vu1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve White / Laura Wallstrom vs Jim Cowan / Diane Cowan3-6, 4-6
2026-01-09vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 7.0: ForrestWon 20
W#1 DoublesKendell Feaker / Kendall Hottell vs Linda Radke / Jeffrey Radke6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteve White / Deb Hewes vs Eftim Gosheff / Bethany Sinclair6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NIN FW MXD 18&0 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ryan Seale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.51
Cosimo Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Margaret Neese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Natalie Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Kayle Davis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Kathleen Markley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Laura Wallstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Vijay Kamineni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Deb Hewes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Kendell Feaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Sweet
published
Steve White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve White + Kathleen Markley10262% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Seale + Natalie Pugh2347% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Seale + Margaret Neese404 matchesnot enough data
Steve White + Margaret Neese303 matchesnot enough data
Steve White + Laura Wallstrom303 matchesnot enough data
Kayle Davis + Kathleen Markley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Seale
136W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
3.5
Cosimo Lombardi
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Margaret Neese
64W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Natalie Pugh
50W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Kayle Davis
61W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kathleen Markley
173W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Laura Wallstrom
89W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Vijay Kamineni
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Deb Hewes
147W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Kendell Feaker
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sandra Sweet
68W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve White
303W–144L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.