Teams

RC GREENHILL

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies N · A

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Chelsea James
published 4.5
3.94
Melissa Greenhill
published
3.84
Kristin Stark
published
3.81
Andree Kale
published 4
3.77
Savannah Carter
published
3.75
Jenna Kinkead
published
3.73
Megan Mikulencak
published
3.72
Andrea Rhodes
published 4
3.70
Gilda Tebeaux
published
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
published
3.69
Lisa Heflin
published
3.67
Clare Stonesifer
published 4
3.66
Rachel Gralapp
published
3.63
Cari Rader
published 4
3.58
Emily Cantey
published
3.42
Shelley Fitzgerald
published
3.38
Leigh Sheppard
published
3.26
Amber Spurgeon
published 3.5
3.19
Lissa Margo
published
3.19
Susan Huber
published
2.97
Jennifer Palko
published
Judy Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Savannah Carter + Andrea Rhodes4444% games−19.0% vs expected
Cari Rader + Megan Mikulencak224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Mikulencak + Andree Kale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chelsea James
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
Melissa Greenhill
33W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Kristin Stark
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Andree Kale
21W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Savannah Carter
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Jenna Kinkead
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Megan Mikulencak
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Andrea Rhodes
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Gilda Tebeaux
34W–29L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Lisa Heflin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Clare Stonesifer
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Rachel Gralapp
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Cari Rader
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Emily Cantey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Shelley Fitzgerald
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Leigh Sheppard
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Amber Spurgeon
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lissa Margo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Susan Huber
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Palko
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Judy Nelson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.