Teams

TeamRiviera

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - Spring Night · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-12vs Miami/deDios/40&over3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Lann / Mary Bartsh vs Maria Jose Dal Lago / Olga Izquierdo4-6, 0-3
L#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Karla Patricia Briceno Monasterio2-5
L#2 DoublesDonna Kass / Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco vs Gabriela Rexach / Ana Pastorino6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-05vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Lann / Mary Bartsh vs Aimee Trujillo / Monica Martinez6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPenelope Johnson / Marnie Tihany vs Yvonne Imbert / Kiki Buigas6-2, 6-1
2024-02-27vs Gallo-White (Miami Lakes)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Fernandez de Castro / Linda Lann vs Lucy Bastidas / Ivonny Brito Levy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#4 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Bertha Lowell vs Judith Gallo - White / Suzel Araguez4-6, 4-6
2024-02-20vs Miami/deDios/40&over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesXIMENA OTERO / Nathalia Blanco vs Olga Izquierdo / Maria Jose Dal Lago4-6, 5-7
2024-02-13vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Lann / Mary Bartsh vs Maria Palacios / Lily Coterillo6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Rajni Agarwal3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeticia Diaz / Nathalia Blanco vs Lorraine Perez / Kiki Buigas6-0, 7-5
2024-02-06vs Gallo-White (Miami Lakes)Won 10
W#1 DoublesYuliet Pellegrini / Lorena Guadiana vs Bibiana Botero / Judith Gallo - White6-2, 6-1
2024-01-31vs Gallo-White (Miami Lakes)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Lann / Nathalia Blanco vs Isabel Maestu / Valeria Cisneros0-6, 2-6
2024-01-23vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 31
W#1 DoublesLinda Lann / Mary Bartsh vs Aimee Trujillo / Tracie Williams6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarnie Tihany vs Rajni Agarwal7-5
W#2 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Maggie Sanchez vs Monica Martinez / Jeannie Serrano6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesMildred Rembisz / Daniella Reynolds vs Iliana Klopfenstein / Lorraine Perez6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Mary Bartsh
published
3.50
Nathalia Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.40
Lorena Guadiana
published
3.39
Donna Kass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Penelope Johnson
published
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Maggie Sanchez
published
3.27
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.23
Jessica Arnesen
published
3.20
3.17
3.13
Denise Fiallo
published 3.5
3.10
Marnie Tihany
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Linda Lann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ANGELA MUSSO + Maria Fernandez de Castro4253% games+9.4% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Leticia Diaz16562% games+4.7% vs expected
Penelope Johnson + Leticia Diaz10361% games+4.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco + Leticia Diaz6556% games+1.6% vs expected
Leticia Diaz + Maggie Sanchez224 matchesnot enough data
Nathalia Blanco + Donna Kass123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Kass + Leticia Diaz303 matchesnot enough data
Donna Kass + Maggie Sanchez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Bartsh
17W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Lorena Guadiana
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Donna Kass
213W–188L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Penelope Johnson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Maggie Sanchez
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jessica Arnesen
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Maria Fernandez de Castro
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Denise Fiallo
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Marnie Tihany
58W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Linda Lann
57W–144L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.