Teams

SPANISH TRAIL

2022 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 6.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-07vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Cohen / Stefani Warren vs Annabel Elliott / Brenda Talley6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Harvey / Mary Anne van Liere vs Carla Kuhl / Shay Momiroff2-6, 5-7
2022-02-28vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah O'Connor / Diane Sorrentino vs Annabel Elliott / Brenda Talley0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesArline Marquez / Stefani Warren vs Ellen Arcella / Shay Momiroff6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Harvey / Mary Anne van Liere vs Carla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz6-4, 6-2
2022-02-25vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDeborah O'Connor / Mary Anne van Liere vs June Sartini / Brenda Talley4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStefani Warren / Arline Marquez vs Ellen Arcella / Shay Momiroff5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-14vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah O'Connor / Diane Sorrentino vs Shay Momiroff / Brenda Talley5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Bradley / Mary Anne van Liere vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini3-6, 1-1
W#3 DoublesArline Marquez / Stefani Warren vs Ellen Arcella / Vicki Schwartz6-1, 6-0
2022-02-07vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Prokopchuk / Stefani Warren vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGretchen Hau / Kathy Robinson vs Doris Gagne / Brenda Talley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Sorrentino / Annette Bradley vs Ellen Arcella / Shay Momiroff7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-31vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Jones / Cynthia Prokopchuk vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Cohen / Deborah O'Connor vs Doris Gagne / Shay Momiroff3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesArline Marquez / Stefani Warren vs Carla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-24vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesStefani Warren / Anita Cohen vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Gretchen Hau vs Ellen Arcella / Shay Momiroff6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Anne van Liere / Deborah O'Connor vs Carla Kuhl / Brenda Talley7-6, 6-3
2022-01-17vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Harvey / Cynthia Prokopchuk vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Bradley / Mary Anne van Liere vs Doris Gagne / Aldema Ridge7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLucy Dadourian / Arline Marquez vs Carla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz3-6, 5-7
2022-01-10vs NV/ARCELLA/65&OVERW6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Harvey / Deborah O'Connor vs Annabel Elliott / June Sartini0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Prokopchuk / Mary Anne van Liere vs Doris Gagne / Aldema Ridge7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErlinda Joven / Anita Cohen vs Ellen Arcella / Shay Momiroff0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Stefani Warren
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Annette Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Gretchen Hau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Diane Sorrentino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Deborah O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Arline Marquez
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Cynthia Prokopchuk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.12
Anita Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Mary Anne van Liere
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arline Marquez + Cynthia Prokopchuk142043% games−11.1% vs expected
Mary Anne van Liere + Deborah O'Connor4636% gamesnot enough data
Arline Marquez + Diane Sorrentino1532% gamesnot enough data
Arline Marquez + Stefani Warren314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stefani Warren
50W–90L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Annette Bradley
13W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gretchen Hau
41W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Diane Sorrentino
23W–70L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Deborah O'Connor
59W–84L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Arline Marquez
44W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Cynthia Prokopchuk
34W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Anita Cohen
63W–99L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Mary Anne van Liere
28W–62L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.