← Search

Annette Bradley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 28W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history78 matches
L
2026-01-20 · TEAM ANNETTE/LISA · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Jones
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-18 · TEAM ANNETTE/LISA · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-09 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Behnen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-02 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Behnen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Row
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Sorrentino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-02-09 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doris Gagne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-31 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Caruso
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-20 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Jones
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-12-13 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doris Gagne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-13 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aldema Ridge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-12 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Prokopchuk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 41.9% of games
3.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 37.5% of games
6.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King