Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-18vs Brighton High School-SmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesSherree Greenhalgh / Christie Brightwell vs Joey Archer / Joannie Reeder6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartsie Earl / Kathleen Sorenson vs Sylvia Williams / Michele van Leeuwen6-3, 6-1
2023-08-11vs Brighton High School-SmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMartsie Earl / Kathleen Sorenson vs Joey Archer / Chris Wilde6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesConnie Dean / Vickie MacDonald vs Donna Pizza / Michele van Leeuwen1-6, 4-6
2023-08-04vs Brighton High School-SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Jeanne Harrison vs Janice Smith / Kathy Miller-Rees3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMartsie Earl / Kathleen Sorenson vs Crystal Spackman / Sara Green6-2, 6-3
2023-07-28vs Brighton High School-SmithLost 02
L#2 DoublesMartsie Earl / Kathleen Sorenson vs Donna Pizza / Kathy Miller-Rees4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristie Brightwell / Sherree Greenhalgh vs Joey Archer / Crystal Spackman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-21vs Brighton High School-SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristie Brightwell / Sherree Greenhalgh vs Donna Pizza / Kathy Miller-Rees1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMartsie Earl / Kathy Travers vs Janice Smith / Carole Sharp1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Jeanne Harrison vs Louise O'Reilly / Sara Green6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christie Brightwell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Sherree Greenhalgh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.08
Carla Stoddard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Connie Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Travers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Martsie Earl
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Stacey Maxfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Vickie MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Sorenson + Carla Stoddard4543% games−5.5% vs expected
Martsie Earl + Kathleen Sorenson3356% gamesnot enough data
Sherree Greenhalgh + Christie Brightwell2433% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Carla Stoddard314 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Jeanne Harrison404 matchesnot enough data
Carla Stoddard + Jeanne Harrison044 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Martsie Earl033 matchesnot enough data
Carla Stoddard + Kathy Travers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Brightwell
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
78W–137L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Sherree Greenhalgh
90W–159L career · 3 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Carla Stoddard
124W–150L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kathleen Sorenson
46W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.94
Connie Dean
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jeanne Harrison
9W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Travers
7W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Martsie Earl
40W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Maxfield
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vickie MacDonald
38W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.