Teams

CV-Sun City PD/Susan Whitby

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-01vs CV-Mission Hills/LoberLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Myers / Ann Oswald vs Pamela Biddle / Sherry Bisaillon6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan MacAulay / Milissa Simmons vs Nancy Winslow / Nancy Pacharzina2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSabine Shor / Karen Keinert vs Dawn Govberg / Mary Esper0-6, 2-6
2026-03-31vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/OttesenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Oswald / Susan Myers vs Stella Snethlage / Stacy Harris3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie George / Sharon Fischer vs Janice Walters / Lorri Miller3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSabine Shor / Peggy Solan vs Susan Thronson / Laura Walker1-6, 4-6
2026-02-25vs CV-The Springs/E MartinLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Fischer / Susan Whitby vs Margaret Clancy / Dallas Jasper6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie George / Martha Spano vs Teresa Metke / Deb Stefaniak2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Oswald / Milissa Simmons vs Jennifer Mannix / Ruth Adler6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-18vs CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/J LaMoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Fischer / Susan Myers vs Lainie Dickson / Nancy Fertig6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSabine Shor / Karen Keinert vs Julee Moore / Marcia Chapman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Oswald / Milissa Simmons vs Susan Gagnon / Deborah Beutler7-5, 6-2
2026-02-04vs CV-Mission Hills/LoberLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Fischer / Susan Myers vs Obsidiana Abril-Horpel / Ann Robinow7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Keinert / Sabine Shor vs Nancy Pacharzina / Erica Carpenter3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeron Saunders / Martha Spano vs Dawn Govberg / Mary Esper1-6, 2-6
2026-01-28vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/OttesenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Oswald / Susan Whitby vs Nancy Economopoulos / Stella Snethlage7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Fischer / Patricia Mede vs Lorri Miller / Annie Ottesen2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKeron Saunders / Milissa Simmons vs Sheri Hanson / Kim Clemens2-6, 3-6
2026-01-21vs CV-The Springs/E MartinLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Oswald / Susan Myers vs Margaret Clancy / Deb Stefaniak7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Mede / Susan MacAulay vs Eileen Martin / Alice Griffith4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSabine Shor / Julie George vs Ruth Adler / Catherine Bonneau2-6, 3-6
2026-01-14vs CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/J LaMoriaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Fischer / Susan Myers vs Christina Strigenz / Mary Czerwinski1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan MacAulay / Peggy Solan vs Jennifer LaMoria / Susan Gagnon0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Spano / Susan Whitby vs Deborah Beutler / Ruth Verhoff7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · CV Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/J LaMoria6218616189
2CV-The Springs/E Martin53131125217
3CV-Rancho La Quinta/Ottesen53121228224
4CV-Sun City PD/Susan Whitby1781635264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Ann Oswald
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.44
Martha Spano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie George
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Keinert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Keron Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Milissa Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Mede
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Solan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sabine Shor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sharon Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan MacAulay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Whitby
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Keinert + Sabine Shor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Oswald
4W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Martha Spano
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Julie George
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Keinert
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keron Saunders
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Milissa Simmons
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Mede
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Solan
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sabine Shor
0W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Fischer
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan MacAulay
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Whitby
6W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.