Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Lober

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-01vs CV-Sun City PD/Susan WhitbyWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Biddle / Sherry Bisaillon vs Susan Myers / Ann Oswald7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Winslow / Nancy Pacharzina vs Susan MacAulay / Milissa Simmons6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Govberg / Mary Esper vs Sabine Shor / Karen Keinert6-0, 6-2
2026-03-11vs CV-The Springs/E MartinLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Biddle / Obsidiana Abril-Horpel vs Denise Black / Dallas Jasper5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Dawn Govberg vs Ruth Adler / Kelli Adams6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Winslow / Jane Cunningham vs Eileen Martin / Jennifer Mannix5-7, 4-6
2026-02-25vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/OttesenLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Biddle / Sherry Bisaillon vs Sheri Hanson / Karen LeMaster2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Erica Carpenter vs Nancy Economopoulos / Kim Clemens7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Cunningham / Laurie Lober vs Lorri Miller / Janice Walters3-6
2026-02-11vs CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/J LaMoriaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Robinow / Obsidiana Abril-Horpel vs Jennifer LaMoria / Christina Strigenz2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Bisaillon / Pamela Biddle vs Marci Riley / Shelly Enstrom5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Laurie Lober vs Ruth Verhoff / Mary HillierDavidson1-6, 3-6
2026-02-04vs CV-Sun City PD/Susan WhitbyWon 21
L#1 DoublesObsidiana Abril-Horpel / Ann Robinow vs Sharon Fischer / Susan Myers6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Erica Carpenter vs Karen Keinert / Sabine Shor6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Govberg / Mary Esper vs Keron Saunders / Martha Spano6-1, 6-2
2026-01-21vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/OttesenWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Biddle / Sherry Bisaillon vs Penny Schnabel / Carol Howey7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesObsidiana Abril-Horpel / Erica Carpenter vs Susan Thronson / Stacy Harris6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJean MacHiz / Nancy Winslow vs Stella Snethlage / Sheri Hanson6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-01-15vs CV-The Springs/E MartinLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Robinow / Obsidiana Abril-Horpel vs Eileen Martin / Alice Griffith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Winslow / Erica Carpenter vs Deb Stefaniak / Catherine Bonneau2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJean MacHiz / Mary Esper vs Maurene Cronyn / Ruth Adler1-6, 0-6
2026-01-07vs CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/J LaMoriaLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Biddle / Sherry Bisaillon vs Mary Czerwinski / Mary HillierDavidson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Kate Augus vs Julee Moore / Pamela Olson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Winslow / Jane Cunningham vs Ruth Verhoff / Nancy Fertig6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Dawn Govberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.12
Obsidiana Abril-Horpel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Sherry Bisaillon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Nancy Pacharzina
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.71
Ann Robinow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Jean MacHiz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Mary Esper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Laurie Lober
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erica Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Augus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Winslow
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Pamela Biddle
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Robinow + Obsidiana Abril-Horpel3943% games−5.9% vs expected
Pamela Biddle + Sherry Bisaillon3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Govberg
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Obsidiana Abril-Horpel
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Sherry Bisaillon
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Nancy Pacharzina
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.92
3
Ann Robinow
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Jean MacHiz
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Mary Esper
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Laurie Lober
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jane Cunningham
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Augus
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Winslow
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Biddle
47W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.