Teams

Stone Fall 2021

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Heather Landrus vs Sarah Curfman / Jennifer Lewis2-6, 4-6
2021-10-20vs Carney/JohnsonLost 01
L#2 SinglesPam Howard vs Ellen Spika3-6, 1-6
2021-10-13vs Rosenbery Fresh StartWon 10
W#3 DoublesJean Larson / Pam Howard vs Debra Tresidder / Izabel Luger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Janet Hansen
published
3.26
Lisa Stockmo
published
Ann Hawkins
published 3.5
3.22
Jean Larson
published
3.19
Lisa Schroeder
published
3.17
Lori Powell-Knutson
published
3.14
Annette Ellson
published 3.5
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Suzanne Hermes
published
3.07
Lisa Schurch
published
2.99
Heather Landrus
published 3
2.75
Michele Fredrickson
published
Lynn Saddoris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Hansen + Annette Ellson131250% games+1.6% vs expected
Lisa Stockmo + Lisa Schroeder2942% games−11.5% vs expected
Janet Hansen + Jean Larson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Hansen
21W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Lisa Stockmo
17W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ann Hawkins
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean Larson
11W–23L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Lisa Schroeder
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lori Powell-Knutson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Annette Ellson
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Suzanne Hermes
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lisa Schurch
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Heather Landrus
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Michele Fredrickson
24W–34L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Lynn Saddoris
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.