Teams

MRC:55+ 7.0:Hawley/Islam

2023 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1

20 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesLisa Moore / Jackie Donnelly vs Christine Moore / Lorraine Campo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Torre / Elizabeth Becker vs Rovena Juman / Sylvia Swanson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-09vs TRC:Doubles or Nothing:ZwartWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Sullivan / Alexandra Cabral vs Margaret Mehai / Elizabeth Zarrilli6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Walls / Karen Hanley vs Nelida Reyes-Matos / Dale Norton6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDana Manning / Janet Zupkus vs Norma Zwart / Priscilla Twombly4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-24vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Cabral / Jackie Donnelly vs Francesca Segalas / Angela Jameson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Torre / Terri Weston vs Sandra Gladstone / Lisa Geotes6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Becker / Janet Zupkus vs Susan Nask / Elena Burova6-1, 6-1
2023-06-04vs CP:55 Shades of Play:StoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesSilvia Islam / Marie-Anne Shamash vs Nadine Shaoul / Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Torre / Nancy Hawley vs Evelyn Hagenow / Kathryn Pizzuto6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDana Manning / Janet Zupkus vs Lynne Vaught / Myrna Gardner0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-21vs MIT:In It To Win It:Nava/HavenLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Hawley / Michelle Torre vs Linda Dest / Arla Wiles6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Daly / Jackie Donnelly vs Terry Nolan / Suzie Schroeder1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Curtis / Dana Manning vs Carol Finnucan / Susan Haven2-6, 3-6
2023-04-30vs GF:Body Shots:Goodrich/WalkerLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Hawley / Betsy Demeyer vs Maureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Walls / Diane Sullivan vs Sue Walden / Amy Blume3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Donnelly / Lisa Moore vs Suzanne Black / Susan Dellenbaugh6-1, 6-4
2023-04-15vs WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:BentoWon 21
W#1 DoublesSilvia Islam / Marie-Anne Shamash vs Elizabeth Jaykus / Dara Lieberson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Cabral / Nancy Hawley vs Marcia Hamelin / Anita Mueller2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Donnelly / Lisa Moore vs Nancy Bento / Jamie Katz4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-02vs 4S:Slice Girls:Honey/LawtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Sullivan / Dana Manning vs Wendy English / Mari Inagami1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSilvia Islam / Elizabeth Becker vs Lisa DiCandido / Jennifer Lawton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Gunzy / Julie Curtis vs Pam Goehringer / Elizabeth Rose2-6, 1-6
2023-03-19vs OGT:Silver Foxes:AuchLost 03
L#1 DoublesSilvia Islam / Michelle Torre vs Katherine Curtin / Lauren Stern6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Zohn / Terri Weston vs Kathleen Finlay / Annemarie Rothe3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJaclyn Levin / Susan Daly vs Donna Durvasula / Jeanne Golden1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OGT:Silver Foxes:Auch0920619192
2GF:Body Shots:Goodrich/Walker09171024217
34S:Slice Girls:Honey/Lawton09131124236
4CP:Simply Smashing 55:Catto/Swanson0916925250
5CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone09121230249
6WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Bento09141331247
7MIT:In It To Win It:Nava/Haven09111433249
8MRC:55+ 7.0:Hawley/Islam09111635243
9TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart0991739279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Julie Mooney
published
3.49
Jaclyn Levin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Alexandra Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Lisa Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Nancy Hawley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Marie-Anne Shamash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Laurie Walls
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Dana Manning
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Betsy Demeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Silvia Islam
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Jackie Donnelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Daly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Karen Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Mary Gunzy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Becker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Anna Zohn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Zupkus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Torre
published
Terri Weston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Daly + Lisa Moore3356% games+10.4% vs expected
Susan Daly + Mary Gunzy4352% games+9.6% vs expected
Betsy Demeyer + Nancy Hawley5257% games+7.0% vs expected
Janet Zupkus + Betsy Demeyer4157% games+3.7% vs expected
Laurie Walls + Mary Gunzy6351% games+2.6% vs expected
Silvia Islam + Nancy Hawley151051% games+1.8% vs expected
Silvia Islam + Marie-Anne Shamash5552% games+1.0% vs expected
Alexandra Cabral + Jackie Donnelly6154% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Mooney
115W–81L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Jaclyn Levin
32W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Alexandra Cabral
82W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.40
Lisa Moore
169W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Nancy Hawley
101W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Marie-Anne Shamash
28W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Laurie Walls
92W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Manning
37W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Betsy Demeyer
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Silvia Islam
113W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Jackie Donnelly
85W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.06
Susan Daly
102W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.00
Karen Hanley
103W–111L career · 1 line in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
Mary Gunzy
58W–99L career · 1 line in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Elizabeth Becker
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Anna Zohn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Janet Zupkus
44W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Curtis
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Torre
43W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Weston
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.