Teams

OGT:Silver Foxes:Auch

2023 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-22vs WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:BentoWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Finlay / Annemarie Rothe vs Elizabeth Jaykus / Dara Lieberson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Zaminski / Maria Tardio vs Nancy Bento / Kay Spencer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Cooper / Suzanne Page vs Jamie Katz / Myra Goldberg6-3, 6-3
2023-07-16vs GF:Body Shots:Goodrich/WalkerLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Falconer / Marta Beltramo vs Maureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Page / Ann Zaminski vs Susan Dellenbaugh / Tanya Flynn3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarta Beltramo / Elizabeth Auch vs Nancy Ossenfort / Eileen Troise6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Falconer / Katherine Curtin vs Rovena Juman / Helene Ginsburg3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Durvasula / Ann Zaminski vs Emily Catto / Felicia DeSanto6-3, 6-1
2023-06-04vs 4S:Slice Girls:Honey/LawtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Cooper / Katherine Goldberg vs Mari Inagami / Elizabeth Rose6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Durvasula / Pamela Fuehrer vs Lisa DiCandido / Jennifer Lawton6-7, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Jolliffe / Maria Tardio vs Lu Li / Nancy Meany7-6, 6-1
2023-05-22vs CP:55 Shades of Play:StoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Falconer / Karen Malek vs Deborah Barnwell / Sharon Hawkins6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Stern / Annemarie Rothe vs Janice Frank / Nadine Shaoul6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Tardio / Ann Zaminski vs Kathryn Pizzuto / Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros6-3, 6-3
2023-04-30vs TRC:Doubles or Nothing:ZwartWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Stern / Karen Malek vs Norma Zwart / Janice Lucchesi6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Jolliffe / Donna Durvasula vs Margaret Mehai / Elizabeth Zarrilli4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Goldberg / Jeanne Golden vs Priscilla Twombly / Cheryl Dziubina6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs MIT:In It To Win It:Nava/HavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Curtin / Ann Horowitz vs Terry Nolan / Stefanie Kreiger6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Cooper / Katherine Goldberg vs Maggie Nava / CHRISTINE CHARLES4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Suzanne Page vs Bobbi Deangelis / Arla Wiles1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-02vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Horowitz / Katherine Curtin vs Ellen Clarke / Sharon Jacobson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Auch / Kathleen Finlay vs Francesca Segalas / Angela Jameson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Zaminski / Suzanne Page vs Cindy Lannon / Elena Burova6-2, 6-1
2023-03-19vs MRC:55+ 7.0:Hawley/IslamWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Curtin / Lauren Stern vs Silvia Islam / Michelle Torre7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Finlay / Annemarie Rothe vs Anna Zohn / Terri Weston6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonna Durvasula / Jeanne Golden vs Jaclyn Levin / Susan Daly6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OGT:Silver Foxes:Auch0920619192
2GF:Body Shots:Goodrich/Walker09171024217
34S:Slice Girls:Honey/Lawton09131124236
4CP:Simply Smashing 55:Catto/Swanson0916925250
5CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone09121230249
6WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Bento09141331247
7MIT:In It To Win It:Nava/Haven09111433249
8MRC:55+ 7.0:Hawley/Islam09111635243
9TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart0991739279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Katharina Lewis
published
3.77
Ann Zaminski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Pamela Fuehrer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Karen Malek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Lauren Stern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Ann Horowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Katherine Curtin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Angelika Seebacher
published 3.5
3.21
Kathleen Finlay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Diane Falconer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Elizabeth Auch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Maria Tardio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Annemarie Rothe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Suzanne Page
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Donna Durvasula
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeanne Golden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Goldberg
published
Lisa Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Madelyn Jolliffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marta Beltramo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Auch + Ann Zaminski5262% games+15.3% vs expected
Diane Falconer + Karen Malek4266% games+13.5% vs expected
Diane Falconer + Ann Horowitz8259% games+5.3% vs expected
Katherine Curtin + Ann Horowitz91053% games+0.8% vs expected
Katherine Goldberg + Jeanne Golden3248% games−0.3% vs expected
Karen Malek + Annemarie Rothe12754% games−0.7% vs expected
Ann Horowitz + Pamela Fuehrer1437% games−3.6% vs expected
Katherine Curtin + Karen Malek1440% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katharina Lewis
158W–121L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Ann Zaminski
188W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
Pamela Fuehrer
143W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Karen Malek
303W–170L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lauren Stern
116W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Ann Horowitz
139W–104L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Katherine Curtin
165W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Angelika Seebacher
26W–42L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Finlay
36W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Diane Falconer
155W–134L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Auch
162W–109L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Maria Tardio
127W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Annemarie Rothe
119W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Suzanne Page
59W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Donna Durvasula
38W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Jeanne Golden
23W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Goldberg
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Lisa Cooper
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Madelyn Jolliffe
90W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marta Beltramo
66W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.