Teams

LATA40/KLEEMOFF/LCTC

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs LATA40/Mathews/SSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Linda Sims vs Vishal Gupta / Maryann Simons3-6, 2-6
2025-07-01vs LATA40/Coyle/LCTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Linda Sims vs Rajesh Verma / Lisa Maylath4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-11vs LATA40/Sutton/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorrina Kleemoff / Pete Kleemoff vs Cindy Mills / Craig Mucci7-5, 6-1
2025-06-10vs LATA40/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Corrina Kleemoff vs Robbin Cooper / Jason Patterson6-3, 6-4
2025-06-03vs LATA40/Mathews/SSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesCorrina Kleemoff / Pete Kleemoff vs Chandler Price / Maryann Simons6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesCorrina Kleemoff / Pete Kleemoff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Corrina Kleemoff
published 3.5
3.42
Anh Salmonson
published 3.5
3.28
Denise Holmes
published 3.5
Gina Hilts
published 3.5
3.21
Lori Yuris
published
3.12
Chris Stader
published 3.5
3.08
Pete Kleemoff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
John Hillis
published
2.67
Deborah Poston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ken Holmes
published
Peter Tunmore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corrina Kleemoff + Pete Kleemoff2348% games+0.2% vs expected
Denise Holmes + Ken Holmes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corrina Kleemoff
26W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Anh Salmonson
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Denise Holmes
21W–28L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Gina Hilts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Yuris
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Chris Stader
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Pete Kleemoff
127W–159L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
John Hillis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Deborah Poston
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
Ken Holmes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Tunmore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.