Teams

SoCal/Tang/40&Over9.0XD

2025 Mixed Doubles - 40 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 9.0 Mixed Division

18 players · average NTRP 4.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - 9.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Darcy Simon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.48
Yuri Nichelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.43
EDWARD CHOI
published
4.43
Michele Mouttapa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Jason Gorman
published
4.22
Colin Tang
published 4
4.21
Michael Marley
published
4.20
Eric Gonda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Nicholas de Goede
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Adam Scott
published 4.5
3.95
Julie Flygare
published
3.70
Jenna Parker
published
3.63
Madeline Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Eugene Shin
published
Hank Gwon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Marley + Yuri Nichelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
131W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Darcy Simon
96W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
206W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Michele Mouttapa
125W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
Jason Gorman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
4.22
Michael Marley
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Eric Gonda
66W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Nicholas de Goede
81W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4
Charles Villarino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Parker
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Madeline Chang
27W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Eugene Shin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hank Gwon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.