Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler/Briggs

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W AM

18 players · average NTRP 4.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Katie Zimmerman vs Jen Langston / Michelle Rawstorne1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-22vs Sunpro-AllenLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatie Zimmerman vs Marci Seegmiller3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Owens / Marissa Jackson vs Joanna Heiden / Emma Heiden6-2, 6-2
2023-05-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarissa Jackson / Karin Smith vs Rochelle Obrien / Victoria Lara6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Marz / Marissa Jackson vs Christina Mooney / LIZ CARLSON6-4, 6-4
2023-04-17vs Sunpro-AllenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaty Alder / Marissa Jackson vs Christy Davidson / Nancy Kirk4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Zimmerman / Susan Koelliker vs Winifred Rawstorne / Lisa Mayberry6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-10Split 11
L#1 SinglesKatie Zimmerman vs Cyndi Jones3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRegina Johnson / Marissa Jackson vs Michelle Moscon / Laura Owen7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Lauren Hawley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
4.43
Brook Vietor
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Amy Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Bre Debry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Ashley Park
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.20
Karin Smith
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
4.14
Marissa Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Casey Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Wendy Widerburg
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.97
Christy Owens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.91
Linda Marz
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
3.83
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.79
Susan Koelliker
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
Cristie Briggs
usually #1 Singles 28%, also #2 Singles 28% · published 4
3.72
JaNae Smith
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Katy Alder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.60
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Katie Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JaNae Smith + Regina Johnson9456% games+10.1% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker321059% games+7.2% vs expected
Ashley Park + Casey Pickett4356% games+6.9% vs expected
JaNae Smith + Susan Koelliker3358% games+3.8% vs expected
Brook Vietor + Wendy Widerburg591960% games+3.7% vs expected
Regina Johnson + Marissa Jackson17457% games+2.9% vs expected
Karin Smith + Regina Johnson101252% games+2.5% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + JaNae Smith10653% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hawley
121W–29L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Brook Vietor
150W–45L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Amy Hansen
39W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Bre Debry
23W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Park
104W–40L career · 24 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Karin Smith
141W–69L career · 10 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Marissa Jackson
110W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–133L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Wendy Widerburg
111W–83L career · 8 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Christy Owens
202W–116L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 8 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.91
Tiffany Kasteler
167W–101L career · 19 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 11 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Cristie Briggs
78W–61L career · 16 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
JaNae Smith
221W–188L career · 15 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 9 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Regina Johnson
124W–102L career · 21 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Katie Zimmerman
27W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.