Teams

Wexford (Matthew Steinberg)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Michael Banks
published 4
3.68
Amanda Neal
published 4
3.65
Arpit Bhoti
published 4
3.51
Matthew Steinberg
published
3.37
Alison OConnell
published 3.5
3.34
3.30
Stephanie Chambers
published
Brandi Steinberg
published 3.5
3.16
Michael Forrester
published
2.98
Andrew Chambers
published 3
Amanda Gray
published 3
Hawley Wetzel
published
Matthew Wetzel
published
Ryan Neal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Steinberg + Brandi Steinberg9071% gamesnot enough data
Michael Forrester + Amanda Gray2352% gamesnot enough data
Michael Forrester + Amanda Neal134 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Steinberg + Alison OConnell303 matchesnot enough data
Christopher O'Connell + Amanda Gray303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Banks
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amanda Neal
53W–27L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Arpit Bhoti
59W–26L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Matthew Steinberg
52W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Alison OConnell
60W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Christopher O'Connell
55W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Stephanie Chambers
35W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brandi Steinberg
21W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Forrester
40W–29L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Andrew Chambers
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amanda Gray
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hawley Wetzel
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Wetzel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Neal
27W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.