Teams

WNCL Maggard (CCA)

Combo 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-23vs WNCT Kerr (ARC South)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Maggard / Becky Sanft vs Amanda Williams / Martha Habegger3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Farah / Kelley Wehrkamp vs Quenton Wright / Adriane Deeter5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-09vs WNCA Murray (Brevard)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKaitlyn Quinn / Fiona Teague vs Alexandra Murray / Ava Heffner1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Dephouse / Paige Scully vs Stephanie Nichols / Terri Lowery2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCA Murray (Brevard)1030221
2WNCL Maggard (CCA)000000
3WNCT Kerr (ARC South)0112533
4WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South)0103633

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kaitlyn Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Kathleen Farah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Becky Sanft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Leeann Kelley
published
3.45
Evie Tashie
published
3.31
Elaine Dephouse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Fiona Teague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Stacey Dansky
published
3.19
Paige Scully
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Lauren Maggard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Rebecca Manske
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Sundri Simon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelley Wehrkamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Marcus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evie Tashie + Lauren Maggard6549% games−3.2% vs expected
Evie Tashie + Becky Sanft033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlyn Quinn
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Kathleen Farah
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Becky Sanft
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Leeann Kelley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Evie Tashie
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Elaine Dephouse
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Fiona Teague
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Stacey Dansky
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Paige Scully
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Lauren Maggard
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Rebecca Manske
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Sundri Simon
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Kelley Wehrkamp
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Marcus
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.