Teams

WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South)

Combo 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs WNCL Maggard (CCA)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKarolina Drozdz / Susan Cook vs Stacey Dansky / Kaitlyn Quinn6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Olesiuk / Kaitlyn Peeples Cole vs Evie Tashie / Susan Marcus6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAudrey Fortezzo / Rebecca Carchman vs Lauren Maggard / Elaine Dephouse6-4, 6-2
2026-08-28vs WNCT Kerr (ARC South)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSherrie Voyles / Andi Elliot vs Anne Salter / Nicole Ingle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexis Rosenfelt / Kaitlyn Peeples Cole vs Tara Kerr / Bethany Smith-Martin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Tina Kinard vs Mary Freeman / Rachel Horn1-6, 6-7
2026-08-23vs WNCA Moran (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesTina Kinard / Sherrie Voyles vs Vickie Massey / Angelika Drew7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAudrey Fortezzo / Susan Cook vs Kelly Gillis / Stacy Harris4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Carchman / Hannah Drummond vs Cindy Bull / Jennifer Hudgens3-6, 3-6
2026-08-16vs WNCA Murray (Brevard)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Kinard / Susan Cook vs Jennifer Edney / Alaine LeGrand2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRebecca Carchman / Kelly Olesiuk vs Terri Lowery / Stephanie Nichols2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Karolina Drozdz vs Andrea Smith / Casey Blair6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCA Murray (Brevard)1030221
2WNCL Maggard (CCA)000000
3WNCT Kerr (ARC South)0112533
4WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South)0103633

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jane Christen
published
3.75
Sherrie Voyles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kaitlyn Peeples Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Rebecca Carchman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Andi Elliot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Tina Kinard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.41
Audrey Fortezzo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Kelly Olesiuk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Caroline Anders
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Sarah Landis
published
3.31
Karolina Drozdz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Hannah Drummond
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Alexis Rosenfelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mimi Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Olesiuk + Hannah Drummond4160% games+2.9% vs expected
Sarah Landis + Andi Elliot5455% games−1.9% vs expected
Audrey Fortezzo + Kelly Olesiuk3249% gamesnot enough data
Tina Kinard + Sherrie Voyles314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Kinard + Karolina Drozdz314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Anders + Tina Kinard213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Anders + Audrey Fortezzo123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Landis + Sherrie Voyles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Christen
23W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Sherrie Voyles
36W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.75
Kaitlyn Peeples Cole
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Rebecca Carchman
32W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
3.5
Andi Elliot
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
Tina Kinard
32W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Audrey Fortezzo
26W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Kelly Olesiuk
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Caroline Anders
24W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Sarah Landis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Karolina Drozdz
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Hannah Drummond
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alexis Rosenfelt
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Mimi Gordon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.