Teams

WNCA Moran (Aston Park)

Combo 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-23vs WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVickie Massey / Angelika Drew vs Tina Kinard / Sherrie Voyles5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Gillis / Stacy Harris vs Audrey Fortezzo / Susan Cook6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Bull / Jennifer Hudgens vs Rebecca Carchman / Hannah Drummond6-3, 6-3
2026-08-16vs WNCT Kerr (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 DoublesASHLEY MORAN / Janey Cope vs Martha Habegger / Jennie West6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Gillis / Erica Roberts vs Nicole Ingle / Amanda Williams7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Hile / Carolyn Guengerich vs Tara Kerr / Bethany Smith-Martin7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Women 7.5 Combo Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jenna Winfield
published
3.90
Carolyn Guengerich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Janey Cope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
ASHLEY MORAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Cindy Bull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Vickie Massey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Angelika Drew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.71
Kelly Gillis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Erica Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jennifer Hudgens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Cindy Hile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Allison McCartney
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelika Drew + Janey Cope7077% games+17.8% vs expected
Angelika Drew + Vickie Massey6264% games+11.3% vs expected
Cindy Bull + ASHLEY MORAN4260% games+4.2% vs expected
ASHLEY MORAN + Janey Cope6362% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Winfield
21W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Carolyn Guengerich
13W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
Janey Cope
58W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.85
4
ASHLEY MORAN
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Bull
37W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Vickie Massey
34W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
3.5
Angelika Drew
22W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
Kelly Gillis
58W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
Erica Roberts
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Allison McCartney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.