Teams

PC Overserved Team White - C. Schweitzer

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesAnderson Sasso / Kristen Wulbern vs Alyson Thomas / Karan Orbegoso1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Reiss vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Terry / Sarah Clark vs Siwon Jang / Kathleen Daciek2-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs VDF String Queens - S. CornellLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Schweitzer / Ashley Reiss vs Karalee Kulek-Luzey / Vanvisa Cheung1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaurie Daigle vs Brittany Kissell0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Clark / Ashley Terry vs Robin Feocco / Mary Kampsen6-4, 6-2
2025-02-21vs Cheval - M. McClureLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Wulbern / Anderson Sasso vs LAURA Martin Santana / Dhara Patel4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaurie Daigle vs Marisa McClure2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Schweitzer / Susanna Bray vs Katie Dietz / Linda Weber4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAnderson Sasso / Kristen Wulbern vs Elizabeth Hanlon / Rachel Sultenfuss6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Daigle / Ashley Terry vs Michelle Graba / Amy Brumby5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-24vs Riverhills - C. CoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Schweitzer / Kristen Wulbern vs Carrie Renter / Kristin Rowe6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAshley Reiss vs Pojjamarn Simos4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Daigle / Sarah Clark vs Juliette Eloff / Laura Britz6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Sarah Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Anderson Sasso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Wulbern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Ashley Reiss
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Susanna Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Carol Schweitzer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Laurie Daigle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.95
Ashley Terry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anderson Sasso + Kristen Wulbern3354% games+5.7% vs expected
Laurie Daigle + Ashley Terry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Clark
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.15
3
Anderson Sasso
10W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Kristen Wulbern
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.56
2.5
Ashley Reiss
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
Susanna Bray
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Carol Schweitzer
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Laurie Daigle
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Ashley Terry
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.