Teams

Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers

Adult 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0+ Women's Friday Day · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Briar Club - 4.091371332347
2South Shore - Hot Shots82292153426
3King's Court - 4.07026923228
4The Woodlands Alden Bridge - Summer Fun5226923270
5Missouri City - Sienna Stranger Strings55252554426
6Golfcrest - Kicking Aces55212966496
7Cinco Ranch West - Summer Love34191634271
8The Woodlands Sawmill - Wroten34152043313
9Woodlands CC - Shot Sisters2592654347
10MPTC - I'd Hit That28203066497
11Willowfork - 4.011551384
12Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers16102553364
13BARC - 4.019183274480
14players000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Mary Vosloh
published
3.45
Nancy Rivier-Rogers
published
3.42
Amanda Rossen
published 3.5
3.37
Michelle Gawlik
published
3.30
Barbara Maffett
published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer le Tan
published
Heather Moody
published 3.5
3.23
Kerry Orth
published
3.14
Brandee Johnsen
published 3.5
3.05
Martha Preston
published
3.03
Linda Dalton
published
Amanda Medler
published 3
Jessica Quinn
published
Kathleen Perry
published
Kim Dushinske
published
Kim Land
published
Marilyn Kudrick
published
Tari Cunningham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Rivier-Rogers + Mary Vosloh20959% games+9.9% vs expected
Marilyn Kudrick + Michelle Gawlik033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Vosloh
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Nancy Rivier-Rogers
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Amanda Rossen
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Michelle Gawlik
25W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Barbara Maffett
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Jennifer le Tan
29W–81L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Heather Moody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerry Orth
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brandee Johnsen
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
Martha Preston
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Linda Dalton
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Amanda Medler
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Quinn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Perry
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Dushinske
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Land
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marilyn Kudrick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tari Cunningham
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.