Teams

Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W AM

20 players · average NTRP 3.88 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-10vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharlene Enloe / Nanette Brockbank vs Janelle Pulley / Janice Smith3-6, 3-6
2023-07-27vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Jarvie / Angela Bleak vs Carly Reese / Amber Greenwood1-6, 3-6
2023-07-20vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinLost 01
L#3 DoublesTammy Petersen / Jana Fairbanks vs Charlotte Trahan / Susel Weight2-6
2023-07-06vs Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen/AhrendWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Allen / Nanette Brockbank vs Marsha Elmore / Christina Baer0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-29vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 02
L#1 DoublesNanette Brockbank / Sharlene Enloe vs Belinda Jensen / Lisa Mayberry1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Jarvie / Tammy Petersen vs Halli Craft / Shelli Johnston4-6, 3-6
2023-06-22vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Holland / Emily Jarvie vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Lee Chase6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kat Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 4
3.81
Lisa Bullington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Angela Bleak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.75
Sharlene Enloe
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.75
Nicole Holland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Lori Murdock
published
3.70
Nanette Brockbank
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Leah Lambert
published
3.65
Trista Willardson
published
3.59
Emily Jarvie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Jana Fairbanks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Mindy Christofferson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Andi Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Tammy Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Christine Neeleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Lori Taylor
published
3.34
Heather Allen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.25
Heather Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Rebekah Aubrey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Esther Rowland
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Bleak + Kat Fuller4552% games+11.7% vs expected
Heather Jensen + Mindy Christofferson5453% games+9.5% vs expected
Lisa Bullington + Mindy Christofferson5070% games+9.3% vs expected
Jana Fairbanks + Lisa Bullington5459% games+6.0% vs expected
Nicole Holland + Emily Jarvie241156% games+4.5% vs expected
Angela Bleak + Heather Jensen61245% games+3.6% vs expected
Lisa Bullington + Lori Murdock551760% games+3.4% vs expected
Trista Willardson + Nanette Brockbank5355% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kat Fuller
131W–95L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Lisa Bullington
114W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Sharlene Enloe
120W–104L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Nicole Holland
54W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Lori Murdock
72W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Nanette Brockbank
79W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
Leah Lambert
45W–59L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Trista Willardson
67W–43L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Emily Jarvie
51W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Jana Fairbanks
48W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Mindy Christofferson
68W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Andi Johnson
34W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
Tammy Petersen
40W–55L career · 1 line in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Christine Neeleman
28W–44L career · 1 line in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
Lori Taylor
38W–57L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
4
Heather Allen
64W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Heather Jensen
44W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Rebekah Aubrey
93W–109L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Esther Rowland
82W–121L career · 9 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.