← Search

Nicole Holland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Highland, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 57W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history96 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-03 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-16 · Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · Ivory Ridge-Fairbanks/Bullington · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-1
L
2026-02-19 · Ivory Ridge-Fairbanks/Bullington · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Allen
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · Ivory Ridge-Fairbanks/Bullington · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-4
W
2025-11-20 · Ivory Ridge-Christofferson/Murdock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-06 · Ivory Ridge-Christofferson/Murdock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-1
W
2025-09-25 · Ivory Ridge-Christofferson/Murdock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jarvie
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.5%
47W–27L · 55.7% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert