← Search

Courtnee Poelman

Orem, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 72W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Orem · 4.0
3 of 6
UT · 4.0
95 of 164
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Courtnee is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Courtnee has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Courtnee has gone from the 56th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 70.6% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 59.2% of games
4.0
69.6%
32W–14L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
W
Shelley Petersen / Shelly Lewis
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-5
W
Sherilyn Rawlings / Lisa Mayberry
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shauna Carter
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
−0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Marsh
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jodie Monson / Leah Lambert
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Shepherd
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Tiffany Zarbock / Erin Bradleychamps
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Halladay
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seidi Bennett
+0.068better than expected — took 69% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 5-2
L
Melanie Hall / Suzanne Burdge
2026-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Lisa Mayberry / Taylor Kirk
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Napierski
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 5-4
W
Emily Jarvie / Nicole Holland
2026-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 4-2
W
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 4-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.