Teams

RCC GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 4.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs TTA-E BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Christian O'Rourke vs Thi Than / Caleb Fahrner7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBryan Cobb / Tristan Burm vs Travis Crouch / Porter Ingrum6-3, 7-5
2023-08-29vs CVTA TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Ryne Walz vs Jordan Fritz / Thomas Lastick6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesTristan Burm vs Alexander Muhr7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-22vs NJ ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Christian O'Rourke vs Albert Eng / Thomas DelaFuente7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTristan Burm vs Matthew Picklo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Cobb / Ryne Walz vs Thomas Cauchi / Oscar Torres4-6, 4-6
2023-08-15vs BRMST GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Bryan Cobb vs Sean ONeil / Phil Strobel6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTristan Burm vs Christian Schulz7-5, 6-4
2023-08-08vs BCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTristan Burm / Ryne Walz vs Eric Loof / Pete Nichols6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Bryan Cobb vs Jay Sonnenberg / Thomas Phillips6-4, 6-4
2023-08-01vs CVTA BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Ryne Walz vs Rob Scott / Paul Austin6-4, 6-2
2023-07-25vs ARCA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Christian O'Rourke vs Scott McCool / Paul Sattizahn6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTristan Burm vs Thomas Waye6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Tristan Burm
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.98
Ryne Walz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.93
3.79
Travis LaBerge
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.75
Bryan Cobb
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryne Walz + Travis LaBerge7163% games+7.4% vs expected
Tristan Burm + Travis LaBerge8258% games+3.0% vs expected
Travis LaBerge + Christian O'Rourke224 matchesnot enough data
Ryne Walz + Tristan Burm123 matchesnot enough data
Ryne Walz + Christian O'Rourke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tristan Burm
75W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Ryne Walz
46W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Christian O'Rourke
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Travis LaBerge
115W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Bryan Cobb
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.