Teams

BRMST GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs CVTA TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhil Strobel / Christian Schulz vs Tim Graves / Thomas Lastick6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-29vs NJ ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesPhil Strobel / John Shaw vs Thomas Cauchi / Yah Pisutpongpan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-22vs BCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristian Schulz / Timothy Williams vs Eric Loof / Brian Waters6-3, 6-4
2023-08-15vs RCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesSean ONeil / Phil Strobel vs Travis LaBerge / Bryan Cobb7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristian Schulz vs Tristan Burm5-7, 4-6
2023-08-11vs ARCA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Garn / Timothy Williams vs Robert Ortiz / Paul Sattizahn0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Shaw / Christian Schulz vs Robert Lopez / Keith Jones6-2, 6-2
2023-08-08vs CVTA BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Garn vs Thai La6-4, 7-6
2023-07-25vs TTA-E BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhil Strobel / David Thompson vs Louis Iantorno / Porter Ingrum6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteven Garn vs Caleb Fahrner6-1, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Christian Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Steven Garn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Timothy Williams
published
3.68
William Wendt
published
3.59
Sean ONeil
published
3.52
David Thompson
published 4
3.46
Joseph Bowers
published
3.12
Phil Strobel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Wendt + Joseph Bowers3344% games−1.7% vs expected
Christian Schulz + Steven Garn1550% gamesnot enough data
David Thompson + Sean ONeil134 matchesnot enough data
David Thompson + Steven Garn134 matchesnot enough data
David Thompson + Timothy Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Phil Strobel + Christian Schulz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christian Schulz
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Steven Garn
90W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Timothy Williams
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
William Wendt
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Sean ONeil
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
David Thompson
14W–38L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
Joseph Bowers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Phil Strobel
45W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.