Teams

Westchester Tennis

2021 55&Over Women · 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-08-16vs Concordia (Brown/Dawson)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Curry / Brigitte Tanner vs Heide Marie Bliss / Lisa Dawson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesIris Simens / Laura Saggese vs Laurie Curtis / Dawn Hone7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYvonne Iversen / Lisa Sippel vs Anna Schuler / Margaret Kienzle4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-08-10vs Kings Park, Insignares - NWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathie McDermott-Greene / Katrina Clifford vs Laura Bothfeld / Diane Cymerman6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesNora Holmes / Margarita Urbanczyk vs Alicia Ifshin / Kristen Woll0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Barnwell / Laura Saggese vs Ellen Schubert / Robin Aisenman2-6, 3-6
2021-08-03vs Eastern/Wilson/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathie McDermott-Greene / Grace de Fries vs Mona Giovanni / Lisa Newell0-6, 6-7
2021-07-26vs CRRC: WhackedLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Mixer / Cynthia Curry vs Denise Cohen / Elizabeth Laitman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Hessekiel / Iris Simens vs Bonnie Loewenstein / Linda Alster-Nelson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Barnwell / Kathie McDermott-Greene vs Joan Simon / Maria Sanchez6-2, 6-3
2021-07-19vs NRRC: Barb's BellesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Mixer / Cynthia Curry vs Michelle Fishman / Linda Popper4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Frank / Brigitte Tanner vs Frances Milliken / Mona Swanson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYvonne Iversen / Kathie McDermott-Greene vs Faith Ackerman / Sharon Ollivierre7-6, 6-4
2021-07-11vs Concordia (Brown/Dawson)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNora Holmes / Margarita Urbanczyk vs Diane Martin-Tryhane / Wanda Rettagliata3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Mixer / Brigitte Tanner vs Susan Bartow / Dawn Hone4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Hessekiel / Kathie McDermott-Greene vs Anna Schuler / Margaret Kienzle3-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs Kings Park, Insignares - NWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatrina Clifford / Kathie McDermott-Greene vs Laurie Schoenfeld / Kathy Dennis6-2, 6-3
2021-06-28vs NRRC: Barb's BellesLost 03
L#1 DoublesNora Holmes / Iris Simens vs Michelle Fishman / Susan Silver Schlecker3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Frank / June Scharf vs Faith Ackerman / Deborah Antoine1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNadine Shaoul / Madeleine Willi vs Frances Milliken / Lynne Prior0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKim Mixer / June Scharf vs Sandra Khouri / Kristen Woll0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Hessekiel / Brenda Gordon vs Robin Frankel / Nanette Koryn3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusanne Sparks / Yvonne Iversen vs Andrea Cantor / Linda Liu6-7, 2-6
2021-06-14vs CRRC: WhackedLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Saggese / Kim Mixer vs Janet Bashford / Margo Smith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNora Holmes / Cynthia Curry vs Denise Cohen / Janine Marino1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Frank / Brigitte Tanner vs Elizabeth Laitman / Bonnie Loewenstein6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: WTC: The Young and the Rest of Us0821313171
2NRRC: Barb's Belles0814923197
3Concordia (Brown/Dawson)08131024210
4CRRC: Whacked0861839244
5Westchester Tennis0842041263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brenda Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Lisa Sippel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Kim Mixer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.53
Nora Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Cynthia Curry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Kathie McDermott-Greene
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Brigitte Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Hessekiel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Deborah Barnwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Yvonne Iversen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Iris Simens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Frank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
June Scharf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Saggese
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Madeleine Willi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nadine Shaoul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Iversen + Brenda Gordon3449% games+4.9% vs expected
Deborah Barnwell + Nadine Shaoul3549% games+4.7% vs expected
Laura Saggese + Kim Mixer2840% games+0.4% vs expected
Brenda Gordon + Lisa Sippel4449% games−2.8% vs expected
Cynthia Curry + Nora Holmes6942% games−3.3% vs expected
Brigitte Tanner + Nora Holmes1633% games−4.8% vs expected
Andrea Hessekiel + Janice Frank3244% games−6.5% vs expected
Sharon Hawkins + Nadine Shaoul101346% games−11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Gordon
68W–72L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Sippel
71W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Kim Mixer
46W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Nora Holmes
181W–161L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Cynthia Curry
25W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Kathie McDermott-Greene
168W–103L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brigitte Tanner
124W–163L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Hessekiel
92W–104L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Deborah Barnwell
69W–107L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Yvonne Iversen
110W–127L career · 9 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Iris Simens
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janice Frank
97W–93L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
June Scharf
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Saggese
31W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Madeleine Willi
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Nadine Shaoul
89W–108L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Hawkins
98W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.