Teams

Luebbe/55s 9.0W

2026 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 9.0 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-11vs OK/Willis/55&over9.0 WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarisa Kendrick / Michele Hill vs Carol Griffith / Sara Delgado1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Melissa Clark vs Tammy Been / Susie Anderson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-11vs OK/Willis/55&over9.0 WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Clark / Susie Luebbe vs Amanda Scroggs / Sara Delgado6-0, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarisa Kendrick / Michele Hill vs Susie Anderson / Clarice Clash5-7, 1-6
2026-03-29vs OK/Willis/55&over9.0 WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Hall / Anne McKinney vs Tammy Been / Mary Fox3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMelissa Clark / Kelly Roark vs Stephanie Miller / Jenny Willis1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Hill / Susie Luebbe vs Sharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine6-4, 7-6
2026-03-28vs OK/Willis/55&over9.0 WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusie Luebbe / De'Aun Sandvig vs Sharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Clark / Kelly Roark vs Carol Griffith / Mary Fox6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Hill / Anne McKinney vs Stephanie Miller / Jenny Willis1-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs OK/Willis/55&over9.0 WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Clark / Susie Luebbe vs Tammy Been / Mary Fox6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDe'Aun Sandvig / Kelly Roark vs Stephanie Miller / Jenny Willis4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarisa Kendrick / Emily Hall vs Sharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Willis/55&over9.0 W5010510100
2Luebbe/55s 9.0W0551022152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Kelly Roark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
De'Aun Sandvig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Susie Luebbe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Marisa Kendrick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Emily Hall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Michele Hill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Anne McKinney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Hill + Anne McKinney8756% games−1.1% vs expected
Michele Hill + Kelly Roark224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Roark
91W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
De'Aun Sandvig
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Susie Luebbe
32W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Marisa Kendrick
67W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.75
Emily Hall
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Michele Hill
74W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Anne McKinney
58W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.