Teams

OK/Willis/55&over9.0 W

2026 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 9.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-11vs Luebbe/55s 9.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarol Griffith / Sara Delgado vs Marisa Kendrick / Michele Hill6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTammy Been / Susie Anderson vs Susie Luebbe / Melissa Clark6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs Luebbe/55s 9.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Sara Delgado vs Melissa Clark / Susie Luebbe0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusie Anderson / Clarice Clash vs Marisa Kendrick / Michele Hill7-5, 6-1
2026-03-29vs Luebbe/55s 9.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Been / Mary Fox vs Emily Hall / Anne McKinney6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Miller / Jenny Willis vs Melissa Clark / Kelly Roark6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine vs Michele Hill / Susie Luebbe4-6, 6-7
2026-03-28vs Luebbe/55s 9.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine vs Susie Luebbe / De'Aun Sandvig6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Griffith / Mary Fox vs Melissa Clark / Kelly Roark2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Miller / Jenny Willis vs Michele Hill / Anne McKinney6-1, 6-2
2026-03-28vs Luebbe/55s 9.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Been / Mary Fox vs Melissa Clark / Susie Luebbe3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Miller / Jenny Willis vs De'Aun Sandvig / Kelly Roark6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Anthamatten / Sherry Fine vs Marisa Kendrick / Emily Hall6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Willis/55&over9.0 W5010510100
2Luebbe/55s 9.0W0551022152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Jenny Willis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Amanda Scroggs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Clarice Clash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Sharon Anthamatten
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Sara Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Carol Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.56
Sherry Fine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.56
Tammy Been
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Sandra Leos
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Susie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Fox
published
Stephanie Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Delgado + Sandra Leos6066% games+18.5% vs expected
Tammy Been + Carol Griffith3260% games+17.4% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Sherry Fine4451% games+11.2% vs expected
Jenny Willis + Sherry Fine8854% games+3.3% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Tammy Been6257% games+0.1% vs expected
Mary Fox + Carol Griffith5256% games−0.7% vs expected
Jenny Willis + Stephanie Miller211256% games−2.5% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Stephanie Miller4255% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Willis
59W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Amanda Scroggs
93W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Clarice Clash
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Sharon Anthamatten
71W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.94
Sara Delgado
32W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
4.5
Carol Griffith
47W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.75
Sherry Fine
74W–81L career · 8 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.56
Tammy Been
49W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
Sandra Leos
82W–54L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.34
Susie Anderson
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Mary Fox
32W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Miller
47W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.