Teams

MD.Jennings

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-15vs TOC.BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesBryson Toubassi / Krister Eriksson vs Joshua Franceschina / Ben Glass7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Marquina / Jonathan Wade vs James Miron / Grant McGrew6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Garcia / Justin Williams vs Parker Sheridan / William Gray6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-08vs TOC.HullLost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Wade / David Marquina vs David Chermak / Praveen Chandrasekhar5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Garcia / Krister Eriksson vs Jason Hull / Joao Freitas2-6, 5-7
2026-08-01vs TOC.ByrdWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Henry Lee vs Drew Slocum / Andrew Perdue6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJustin Williams / Vance Jennings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryson Toubassi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
David Marquina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.39
Geoffrey Vollman
published 4.5
4.28
Todd Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.28
Vance Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Jonathan Wade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Chris Crumpler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Krister Eriksson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Jerfi Cicin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vance Jennings + Chris Crumpler101351% games−5.5% vs expected
Vance Jennings + Krister Eriksson303 matchesnot enough data
Krister Eriksson + Chris Crumpler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bryson Toubassi
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
David Marquina
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
4.5
Geoffrey Vollman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
Todd Garcia
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
Jonathan Wade
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Chris Crumpler
62W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Krister Eriksson
82W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Jerfi Cicin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.