Teams

TOC.Brown

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs TOC.ByrdWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Ben Glass vs Aaron Legum / Herman Gudjonson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNick Brittis / James Miron vs Nicolas Quevedo / Jack Baur4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRawle Sue-Ho / William Martin vs Kwame Owens / Zachariah Anderson6-1, 6-1
2026-08-22vs TOC.SaykoWon 30
W#1 DoublesOwen McGrew / Grant McGrew vs Migel Hidalgo Saldana / Visakan Jayakumar6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Connor Wilkins vs Brad Burgess / Jonathan Canon7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRawle Sue-Ho / Parv Mital vs Wes Watson / Gaurav Luther7-5, 6-4
2026-08-15vs MD.JenningsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Ben Glass vs Bryson Toubassi / Krister Eriksson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Miron / Grant McGrew vs David Marquina / Jonathan Wade7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesParker Sheridan / William Gray vs Todd Garcia / Justin Williams6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-01vs TOC.HullLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Parker Sheridan vs David Chermak / Praveen Chandrasekhar6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hankinson / William Martin vs Daniel Ballivian / Kyle Zhou2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGrant McGrew / Aneesh Kodali vs Jason Hull / Andrew Dinicola6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Hull3081364
2TOC.Brown1142762

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Joshua Franceschina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.78
Grant McGrew
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.69
John Hankinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Connor Wilkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Parv Mital
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Owen McGrew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Rawle Sue-Ho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Parker Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.35
James Miron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Nick Brittis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Ben Glass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
William Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grant McGrew + Owen McGrew15560% games+3.8% vs expected
Joshua Franceschina + Parker Sheridan5162% gamesnot enough data
Aneesh Kodali + Parker Sheridan404 matchesnot enough data
Grant McGrew + John Hankinson123 matchesnot enough data
Grant McGrew + Parker Sheridan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Joshua Franceschina
80W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Grant McGrew
92W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.78
John Hankinson
35W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.64
Parv Mital
35W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Owen McGrew
87W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
4.45
Rawle Sue-Ho
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
James Miron
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
Nick Brittis
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Ben Glass
21W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
William Martin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.