Teams

TOC.Byrd

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs TOC.BrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAaron Legum / Herman Gudjonson vs Joshua Franceschina / Ben Glass7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicolas Quevedo / Jack Baur vs Nick Brittis / James Miron6-4, 6-3
2026-08-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicolas Quevedo / Christopher Lott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-08vs TOC.SaykoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Nicolas Quevedo vs Ryan Sayko / Wes Watson7-6, 7-6
2026-08-01vs MD.JenningsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDrew Slocum / Andrew Perdue vs Chris Crumpler / Henry Lee3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Herman Gudjonson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Andrew Perdue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Brett Eckles
published 4.5
4.30
Nicolas Quevedo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Patrick Newsome
published
4.21
Patrick Shields
published
4.11
Matthew Frazer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Tevin Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Nick Gilder
published 4
3.87
Chris Culver
published 4
3.87
Christopher Lott
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tevin Wilson + Matthew Frazer6267% games+14.0% vs expected
Tevin Wilson + Nick Gilder13364% games+13.5% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Herman Gudjonson6262% games+2.3% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Herman Gudjonson161257% games−0.1% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games−0.4% vs expected
Andrew Perdue + Nicolas Quevedo4157% games−0.5% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Brett Eckles + Nick Gilder224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Herman Gudjonson
115W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.55
4.5
Andrew Perdue
38W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Nicolas Quevedo
48W–18L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Patrick Newsome
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Patrick Shields
43W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
Matthew Frazer
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.11
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Tevin Wilson
131W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Chris Culver
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Christopher Lott
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.