Teams

Pipes/40/6.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 16 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 23 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 30 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-09-02vs Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Thiels / Shane Faulkner vs Slattery Johnson / Mark Bissell6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrian Furqueron / Patrick Hannon vs Jason Rogers / Tripper Dickson6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatt Sawrie / William Coats vs Jesse Waller / Augustine Rivera5-7, 1-6
2026-08-26vs Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCody Lenert / Eric Basinger vs Slattery Johnson / Augustine Rivera2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Brignac / Corey Pepper vs Steven Anderson / Sid Haley7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Hannon / Shane Faulkner vs Matt Chandler / Jason Rogers6-3, 6-4
2026-08-12vs Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Furqueron / Chris Thiels vs Slattery Johnson / Augustine Rivera2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Sawrie / Corey Pepper vs Steven Anderson / Sid Haley5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Pipes / Brian Bouillon vs Tim Stuart / Scott Sutton7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stuart/40/6.5/CM/BTC1021229
2Pipes/40/6.5/CM/BTC0112436

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Chris Tilley
published 3.5
3.48
Shane Faulkner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Daniel Brignac
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Jamie Pipes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Brian Furqueron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Chris Thiels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.24
Lee Daville
published
3.23
Eric Basinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Matt Sawrie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Cody Lenert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
William Coats
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Patrick Hannon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Corey Pepper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Brian Bouillon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Craig McCloud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Bill Bowdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Coats + Bill Bowdon5069% games+20.4% vs expected
Chris Thiels + Craig McCloud5072% games+18.6% vs expected
Patrick Hannon + Cody Lenert5077% games+13.9% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Eric Basinger2443% games+2.4% vs expected
Patrick Hannon + William Coats404 matchesnot enough data
Lee Daville + Brian Bouillon404 matchesnot enough data
Matt Sawrie + Brian Furqueron213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Sawrie + Daniel Brignac213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Tilley
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Shane Faulkner
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Daniel Brignac
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Jamie Pipes
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Brian Furqueron
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3
Chris Thiels
40W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Lee Daville
28W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Eric Basinger
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Matt Sawrie
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Cody Lenert
24W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
William Coats
53W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Patrick Hannon
31W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Corey Pepper
22W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Brian Bouillon
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Craig McCloud
41W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Bill Bowdon
29W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.