Teams

SDNC 8.0 RBCTC/ Fisher

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SDNC

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#3 DoublesKelly Frez / TERESA FISHER vs Ronda Smyth / Lori Swingle2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesConnie Balen / Trish Watson vs Teresa Bear / Lori Roth6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-15vs SDNC 8.0 S&T- MCC/ ClarkWon 20
W#1 DoublesTERESA FISHER / Tobee Jackson vs Kelley McNaught-Davis Hess / Nancy Willis6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRindy Barnes / Jamie Neppl vs Linda Slome / Lauren Cohen7-6, 6-3
2026-07-08vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ LinhoffLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheri Ortiz / Connie Balen vs Corine Gulli / Kathy Wilson4-6, 6-7
2026-07-01vs SDNC LLW WD 8.0 FRCC/ RodriguezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTERESA FISHER / Kelly Frez vs Wendy Burgoon / Robin Seay3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSheri Ortiz / Trish Watson vs Shelley Federhart / Amy Rodriguez6-3, 6-0
2026-06-24vs SDNC 8.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ KelterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnie Balen / Trish Watson vs Yoon Choi / Anne Reese4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Rogers / Lara Wozniak vs Carol Gay / Kay Lin6-2, 6-3
2026-06-17vs SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ PaddisonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheri Ortiz / Jamie Neppl vs Kellie Doyle / Jennifer Hackett0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTrish Watson / Stacey Dusseault vs Alison Pasiut / Salma Ott6-2, 6-3
2026-06-10vs SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ AckleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesConnie Balen / Rindy Barnes vs Sara Ackley / Helen Bruton1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLara Wozniak / TERESA FISHER vs Lisa Erickson / Devera Marshall6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoan Rogers / CORRI HARVEY vs Christie Jackson / Nelda Swanson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs SDNC 8.0 Miracosta College/ ForeWon 20
W#2 DoublesMargaret Hulme / Rindy Barnes vs Kathleen Doherty / Laura Zack6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLara Wozniak / TERESA FISHER vs Jill Twombly / Jutta Laurino6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · Summer- SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC LLW WD 8.0 FRCC/ Rodriguez9123720235
2SDNC 8.0 Valley Center TC/ Dodds8221923236
3SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ Linhoff64181229264
4SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ Adams64151535283
5SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ Vanderhyden55151533268
6SDNC 8.0 S&T- MCC/ Clark55141640311
7SDNC 8.0 RBCTC/ Fisher46131736274
8SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ Paddison46121841319
9SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Ackley46121842300
10SDNC 8.0 Miracosta College/ Fore37141634272
11SDNC 8.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ Kelter1982249331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Margaret Hulme
published 4
3.79
Xiaoxia Yu
published 4
3.69
Rindy Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Stacey Dusseault
published 4
3.69
TERESA FISHER
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Tobee Jackson
published 4
3.63
Connie Balen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Lara Wozniak
published 4
3.61
Joan Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Trish Watson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Di Desiderio
published 4
3.49
CORRI HARVEY
published 4
3.48
Kelly Frez
published 4
3.47
Sheri Ortiz
published 4
Jamie Neppl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tobee Jackson + TERESA FISHER5153% games+4.8% vs expected
Stacey Dusseault + CORRI HARVEY51149% games+4.1% vs expected
Xiaoxia Yu + Tobee Jackson332453% games−2.0% vs expected
Stacey Dusseault + Sheri Ortiz6453% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Ortiz + Tobee Jackson6448% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Dusseault + Tobee Jackson5258% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Dusseault + Kelly Frez5251% gamesnot enough data
Tobee Jackson + Kelly Frez4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margaret Hulme
65W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Xiaoxia Yu
73W–47L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Rindy Barnes
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Stacey Dusseault
123W–98L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
TERESA FISHER
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Tobee Jackson
105W–77L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Connie Balen
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Lara Wozniak
10W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Joan Rogers
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Trish Watson
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Di Desiderio
31W–49L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
CORRI HARVEY
38W–43L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Kelly Frez
45W–42L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Sheri Ortiz
69W–71L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jamie Neppl
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.