Teams

SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ Paddison

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SDNC

16 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#3 DoublesJill Gilford / Pam Turner vs Haruko Vajda / Lisa Michaels6-2, 6-2
2026-07-22vs SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ AckleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesToni Daugherty / Claudia Gray vs Helen Bruton / Cindy S Miers6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesColleen Roth / Salma Ott vs Christie Jackson / Lisa Erickson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPam Turner / Alison Pasiut vs Sara Ackley / Miki Antrobus3-6, 1-6
2026-07-15vs SDNC 8.0 Miracosta College/ ForeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hackett / Claudia Gray vs Dominique Gambale / Rebecca Merder6-4, 7-5
2026-07-08vs SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ AdamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jennifer Hackett vs Holly Miller / Marie Roll6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSalma Ott / Colleen Roth vs Laurie Dunn / Harriet Isaac7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen Roth / Pam Turner vs Daryl Nann / Lori Roth3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesToni Daugherty / Jennifer Hackett vs Melissa Dodds / Karin Ward6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs SDNC 8.0 RBCTC/ FisherWon 10
W#1 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jennifer Hackett vs Sheri Ortiz / Jamie Neppl6-0, 6-4
2026-06-10vs SDNC 8.0 S&T- MCC/ ClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jennifer Hackett vs Clare Salcedo-Obert / Jessica Mills3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaudia Gray / Ranelle Kain vs Frances Schnall / Lauren Cohen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ LinhoffLost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Turner / Catherine Pla vs Catherine Baird / Susan Gentry2-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs SDNC LLW WD 8.0 FRCC/ RodriguezLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Gray / Ranelle Kain vs Angela Hart / Kathy Williams1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · Summer- SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC LLW WD 8.0 FRCC/ Rodriguez9123720235
2SDNC 8.0 Valley Center TC/ Dodds8221923236
3SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ Linhoff64181229264
4SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ Adams64151535283
5SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ Vanderhyden55151533268
6SDNC 8.0 S&T- MCC/ Clark55141640311
7SDNC 8.0 RBCTC/ Fisher46131736274
8SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ Paddison46121841319
9SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Ackley46121842300
10SDNC 8.0 Miracosta College/ Fore37141634272
11SDNC 8.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ Kelter1982249331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kellie Doyle
published 4.5
3.84
Randy Buckley
published 4
3.74
Claudia Gray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jill Gilford
published 4
3.63
Gayle Paddison
published 4
3.62
Toni Daugherty
published 0
3.60
Catherine Pla
published 4
3.59
3.52
Ranelle Kain
published 4
3.50
Colleen Roth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Alison Pasiut
published 3.5
3.41
Jennifer Hackett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Tory Hill
published 4
3.32
Clare Lemon
published 3.5
3.30
Salma Ott
published 3.5
Pam Turner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayle Paddison + Susanne Chakravarty31044% games−1.1% vs expected
Tory Hill + Kellie Doyle23858% games−1.5% vs expected
Clare Lemon + Randy Buckley4750% games−2.7% vs expected
Salma Ott + Clare Lemon8750% gamesnot enough data
Ranelle Kain + Susanne Chakravarty1635% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Hackett + Kellie Doyle4261% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Roth + Salma Ott044 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Paddison + Clare Lemon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellie Doyle
129W–116L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
4.08
4
Randy Buckley
26W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Claudia Gray
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Jill Gilford
64W–39L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Gayle Paddison
27W–37L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
0
Toni Daugherty
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Catherine Pla
40W–57L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Susanne Chakravarty
39W–85L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Ranelle Kain
13W–37L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Colleen Roth
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Alison Pasiut
36W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jennifer Hackett
30W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
4
Tory Hill
73W–75L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Clare Lemon
117W–140L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Salma Ott
45W–32L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Pam Turner
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.