Teams

BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-25vs BC-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Joyce Choi vs Denise Matsumoto / Lauran Jacks1-6, 1-6
2022-06-05vs BC-LLW-MCC/KristieSherrillLost 01
L#2 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Marian Stavros vs Ethylene Ziegler / Mojgan Vakili1-6, 1-6
2022-04-30vs BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartiniWon 10
W#2 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Joyce Choi vs Amy Eastman / Julie Misch6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Lori Daniels vs Donna Ashcraft / Doris Sung4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kate Kim
published
3.30
Darin Nizich
published 3.5
3.21
Sondee Wolff
published
3.19
Nancy Fournier
published
3.16
Heidi Linscomb
published 3.5
3.11
Kathryn Scandaliato
published
3.10
Joyce Choi
published
2.95
Veronica Deutsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Anna Mendoza
published 3
2.74
Maggie Vaughan
published
2.59
Aryanna Afshar
published 3
Jenny Forsyth
published
Kathie Papera
published
Lori Daniels
published
Lynn Attig
published
Marian Stavros
published
Melissa Villanueva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sondee Wolff + Nancy Fournier134 matchesnot enough data
Sondee Wolff + Kathryn Scandaliato033 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Linscomb + Nancy Fournier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Kim
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Darin Nizich
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Sondee Wolff
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Nancy Fournier
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Heidi Linscomb
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kathryn Scandaliato
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Joyce Choi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Veronica Deutsch
44W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Anna Mendoza
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Vaughan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.74
3
Aryanna Afshar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jenny Forsyth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathie Papera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Daniels
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Attig
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marian Stavros
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Villanueva
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.