Teams

BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-05vs BC-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndree Friedman / Lisa Drexinger vs Colleen Johnson / Cheryl Unrein7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-15vs BC-LLW-MCC/KristieSherrillWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Chen / Lisa Drexinger vs Aubrey Sedberry / Kristie Sherrill7-6, 6-4
2022-04-30vs BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolffLost 01
L#2 SinglesJoy Huffman vs Kate Kim4-6, 0-6
2022-04-24vs BC-BJKTC/JosephineGarrettLost 02
L#2 DoublesLora Penczar / Joy Huffman vs Ginger Vasquez / Jenniffer Wong4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLisa Drexinger vs Susie Kim2-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs BC-AltaVista/SuyonBinghamLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Drexinger / Diann Burns vs Belmarie Huynh / Tsukasa Matsumoto1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Stephanie Rudy
published
3.56
3.36
Kristen Roath
published
3.35
Jennifer Morrow
published
3.34
Leah Duke
published
3.25
Amanda West
published 3.5
Irina Goedemans
published 3.5
3.19
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.18
Lora Penczar
published
3.06
Joy Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Diann Burns
published 3.5
2.86
Lisa Drexinger
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Anne DeMartini
published 3
Analisa Coria
published 3
Linda Cronkite
published
Luan Smith
published
Susan Myers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rudy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kristy Kinsey Brosius
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kristen Roath
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jennifer Morrow
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Leah Duke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Irina Goedemans
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Joy Huffman
39W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Diann Burns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Lisa Drexinger
122W–173L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Analisa Coria
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Cronkite
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luan Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Myers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.