Teams

SDNC 8.0 Fallbrook/ Ustariz

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-20vs SDNC 8.0 Morgan Run/ FiliciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Russo / Michael Russo vs Marvin Pantangco / Rebecca Fritz0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Jennifer Kries vs Seth Mullen / Rebekah Seidel6-7, 3-6
2022-08-06vs SDNC 8.0 RSF TC/ PenningtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Russo / Tracy Russo vs Moffitt Timlake / Mary Gaylord3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-31vs SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ MarWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / CHARLOTTE DEHESA vs Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess / Kelley McNaught-Davis Hess6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-23vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ BairdWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Russo / Michael Russo vs Tricia Weisman / Carl Slabicki6-2, 6-0
2022-07-09vs SDNC 8.0 RB S&TC/ MaddenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Russo / Tracy Russo vs David Yang / Debbie Gerlack4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Cristina Leivas vs Terry Mattoon / Sun Lee1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-02vs SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito/ FroydWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Cristina Leivas vs Stepan Kartsub / Lori Kartsub6-2, 6-2
2022-06-25vs SoCal/Warren/Mixed40&Over8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Russo / Tracy Russo vs Shelley Federhart / Andrew Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Nelson Quintana
published
3.85
Elvia Quintana
published 4
Briana Masters
published 4
3.73
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michael Russo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Jennifer Kries
published 4
3.48
Diana Ortuno
published 4
3.40
Edwin Ustariz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Manny Ortuno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edwin Ustariz + CHARLOTTE DEHESA6647% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Quintana
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4
Elvia Quintana
179W–106L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Briana Masters
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
145W–114L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Michael Russo
107W–77L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Jennifer Kries
102W–95L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Diana Ortuno
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Edwin Ustariz
106W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Manny Ortuno
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.