Teams

C 5.5W PW Frazier

2023 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-28vs C 5.5W WR2 GottardiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Hallissey / Tina Hicov vs Brenda Petersen / Eva Volf2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Almenar / Chia-Yu Chung vs Kate Gottardi / Mindy Barron6-0, 6-1
2023-04-23vs C 5.5W MM DebenhamLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudit Simon / Chia-Yu Chung vs Karin Mellino / Julia Han5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaitlin MacDonald / Amanda Thome vs Carlina Bramhall / Sanita Kazazic1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicole Drahuschak / Tracy Hughes vs Debra Bode / Laurie Debenham4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-31vs C 5.5W CC GrosescuWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaitlin MacDonald / Chia-Yu Chung vs Amalia Stoica / Shelby Novick6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Boudon / Molly Johnson vs Brooke Garson / Myriam Morgan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Almenar / Amanda Thome vs Iuliana Grosescu / Haley Jividen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-24vs C 5.5W WR1 FeteLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabella Heimke / Amanda Thome vs Michelle Schenker / Beth Greenwood6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Hallissey / Jessica Paprzycki vs Terri Treblas / Stacey Drozda6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Drahuschak / Tina Hicov vs Kathleen Lanese / Chris Powers4-6, 2-1
2023-03-10vs C 5.5W WR2 GottardiLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Almenar / Jennifer Scheel vs Olga Khrenova / Yiqin Huang6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaitlin MacDonald / Tracy Hughes vs Brenda Petersen / Eva Volf2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAshley Frazier / Wei-Hsuan Liao vs Kate Gottardi / Kalee Oberlin3-6, 1-6
2023-03-03vs C 5.5W MM DebenhamLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Thome / Judit Simon vs Julia Han / Karin Mellino6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChia-Yu Chung / Isabella Heimke vs Kristen Boll / Elizabeth Sullivan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Hicov / Lynn Boudon vs Carlina Bramhall / Sanita Kazazic6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-24vs C 5.5W CC GrosescuLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Almenar / Molly Johnson vs Tisha Bell / Shelby Novick2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCaitlin MacDonald / Amanda Thome vs Stephanie Mabee / Haley Jividen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Hallissey / Wei-Hsuan Liao vs Michelle Nelson / Debra Speicher4-6, 3-6
2023-02-19vs C 5.5W WR1 FeteWon 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Johnson / Nicole Drahuschak vs Kathleen Lanese / Nicole Mueller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Frazier / Chia-Yu Chung vs Angela Bolbach / Chris Powers6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W CC Grosescu6217716171
2C 5.5W MV2 Wortmann64171328262
3C 5.5W PM Karayan64171332268
4C 5.5W MM Debenham53141026208
5C 5.5W LT Burgess55141637283
6C 5.5W NC Trent46151531256
7C 5.5W GR Denissoff46151538286
8C 5.5W WE2 Strawser46111940283
9C 5.5W PW Frazier35121230212
10C 5.5W WR2 Gottardi35111330247
11C 5.5W WR1 Fete3561840271
12C 5.5W CV Urbanowski2892146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ashley Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Isabella Heimke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Caitlin MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Nicole Drahuschak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Chia-Yu Chung
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Amy Gyetko
published 3
2.75
Judit Simon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Meenakshi Sharma
published
2.63
Amanda Thome
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Jessica Paprzycki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Wei-Hsuan Liao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Scheel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Hallissey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Boudon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Almenar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tina Hicov
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Hughes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Frazier + Caitlin MacDonald171054% games+7.8% vs expected
Ashley Frazier + Nicole Drahuschak6256% games+3.4% vs expected
Kathleen Hallissey + Jessica Paprzycki5348% games+2.9% vs expected
Caitlin MacDonald + Nicole Drahuschak3352% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Drahuschak + Michelle Almenar4253% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Paprzycki + Amanda Thome1444% gamesnot enough data
Judit Simon + Amanda Thome404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Frazier + Jessica Paprzycki224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Frazier
98W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Isabella Heimke
53W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Caitlin MacDonald
51W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Nicole Drahuschak
56W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Chia-Yu Chung
33W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Amy Gyetko
21W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Judit Simon
23W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Meenakshi Sharma
54W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%16%84%
2.63
3
Amanda Thome
41W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jessica Paprzycki
30W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Wei-Hsuan Liao
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.36
Jennifer Scheel
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Hallissey
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Boudon
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Almenar
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Hicov
6W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Hughes
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.