Teams

C 5.5W MV2 Wortmann

2023 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-24vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Brady / Sara Nine vs Jennifer Zidar / Jennifer Allan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShari Thompson / Noor Almudallal vs Yeva Dade / Beth Kennedy6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Jordan / Giovanna Ventre vs Mindy Qua / Gail Vogel6-1, 6-3
2023-03-17vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesElisa Meadows / Felicia Norman vs Ivana Urbanowski / Celeste Asmar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Nine / Meghan Sabitsch vs Mary Murray / Lisa Manis6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristan Quinn / Bella Patel vs Jennifer Henderson / Krista Ensign6-3, 6-3
2023-02-10vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeghan Sabitsch / Felicia Norman vs Denise Hwang / Susan Wiley0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElisa Meadows / Ritu Makkar vs Esther McElhinney / Leigh Strawser2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Jordan / Giovanna Ventre vs Jennifer Allan / Gail Vogel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-03vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Brady / Felicia Norman vs Renee Morgan / Celeste Asmar6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYasna Ottens / Misty Morris vs Carol Catalano / Carrie Fromson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Jordan / Valerie Kuykendall vs Laila Stephenson / Shoshana Greenberg7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W CC Grosescu6217716171
2C 5.5W MV2 Wortmann64171328262
3C 5.5W PM Karayan64171332268
4C 5.5W MM Debenham53141026208
5C 5.5W LT Burgess55141637283
6C 5.5W NC Trent46151531256
7C 5.5W GR Denissoff46151538286
8C 5.5W WE2 Strawser46111940283
9C 5.5W PW Frazier35121230212
10C 5.5W WR2 Gottardi35111330247
11C 5.5W WR1 Fete3561840271
12C 5.5W CV Urbanowski2892146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Liza Brady
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Meghan Sabitsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Felicia Norman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elisa Meadows
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Yasna Ottens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Shari Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Valerie Kuykendall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Noor Almudallal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Sara Nine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Misty Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Giovanna Ventre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Bella Patel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Ritu Makkar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Frederick
published
Kelly Jordan
published
Kristan Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisa Meadows + Yasna Ottens5267% games+14.2% vs expected
Kristan Quinn + Yasna Ottens6352% games+7.1% vs expected
Kristan Quinn + Shari Thompson5646% games−12.3% vs expected
Elisa Meadows + Meghan Sabitsch2348% gamesnot enough data
Shari Thompson + Yasna Ottens2346% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Sabitsch + Kristan Quinn314 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Kuykendall + Felicia Norman314 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Kuykendall + Misty Morris224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liza Brady
161W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Meghan Sabitsch
72W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Felicia Norman
45W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Elisa Meadows
71W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Yasna Ottens
53W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Shari Thompson
40W–55L career · 1 line in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
Valerie Kuykendall
37W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
0%28%72%
2.58
Noor Almudallal
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
Sara Nine
36W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.52
Misty Morris
20W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Giovanna Ventre
48W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%75%25%
2.41
3
Bella Patel
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40
Ritu Makkar
28W–50L career · 1 line in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.32
Karen Frederick
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Jordan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristan Quinn
38W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.