Teams

Florida/Strickland/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0W

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-10vs Eagle Harbor - JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Moody / Kerri Robison vs Jaye Andone / Nancy Wentz6-0, 6-2
2023-07-31vs St. Johns Golf & CC - KurtzLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Swearingen / Marianne Maetozo vs Betsy Crook / Heather Aiello1-6, 1-6
2023-07-20vs Magnolia Point - ScottLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Moody / Mani Prieto vs Teri Stevens / Nancy Racine3-6, 3-6
2023-07-13vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Maetozo / Amanda Swearingen vs Mari Hinds / Reiko Sheridan6-0, 6-4
2023-06-29vs Club Continental - Latta-RainesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Swearingen / Kerri Robison vs Claudia Grosskruger / Kathleen Pinho6-3, 6-4
2023-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Swearingen / Marianne Maetozo vs Julie Long / Suzanne Leach6-4, 6-2
2023-06-08vs Marsh Creek - LawrenceLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Jabot / Amanda Swearingen vs Molly Courcy / Britta Messler3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Jabot
published
3.84
Amanda Swearingen
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Cheryl Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Mani Prieto
published
3.61
Susan Asher
published
3.30
Oksana Andersen
published
3.27
Ann Tiefenthaler
published 3.5
3.23
Kendall Taylor
published
3.21
Tracy Hodges
published
3.19
Lynn Bledsoe
published
3.19
Kim Loferski
published
3.15
Christina Rigby
published 3.5
2.81
Lindsay Lynch
published
Nina Strickland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mani Prieto + Susan Asher4256% games+1.4% vs expected
Mani Prieto + Jill Jabot314 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Taylor + Jill Jabot314 matchesnot enough data
Ann Tiefenthaler + Kim Loferski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Jabot
37W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Cheryl Moody
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Mani Prieto
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Susan Asher
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.61
Oksana Andersen
25W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ann Tiefenthaler
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Kendall Taylor
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracy Hodges
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Lynn Bledsoe
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Kim Loferski
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Christina Rigby
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lindsay Lynch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.81
Nina Strickland
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.