Teams

Eagle Landing - Brink

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-10vs Magnolia Point - ScottWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Bleiel / Mari Hinds vs Nancy Racine / Deneen Barrett6-3, 6-0
2023-08-03vs Harbour Island - LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Bleiel / Mari Hinds vs Connie Kent / Suzanne Leach6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-20vs St. Johns Golf & CC - KurtzWon 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Jones-Looney / Grace Sales vs Betsy Crook / Nancy Scranton7-6, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMari Hinds / Reiko Sheridan vs Marianne Maetozo / Amanda Swearingen0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMari Hinds / Judibelle Roman vs Tracy Brogan / Maria Welch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Ruth Jones-Looney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cindy Bleiel
published 4
3.63
Mari Hinds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Danielle Euwema
published 3.5
3.40
Judibelle Roman
published
3.37
Angela Johnson
published 3.5
3.36
PATSY REYNOLDS
published
3.36
Jessica Downs
published
3.27
Eden Payton
published 3.5
3.27
Lan Nguyen
published
Amarillys Rodriguez
published 3.5
2.96
Tina Bobango
published
2.83
Susan Brink
published
Kara Coffey
published
Karlie Goodman
published
Reiko Sheridan
published
Sue Newman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Newman + Jessica Downs5068% games+11.5% vs expected
Mari Hinds + Ruth Jones-Looney5357% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Euwema + Jessica Downs404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruth Jones-Looney
93W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Cindy Bleiel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Mari Hinds
56W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Danielle Euwema
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
Judibelle Roman
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Angela Johnson
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
PATSY REYNOLDS
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jessica Downs
19W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Eden Payton
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Lan Nguyen
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amarillys Rodriguez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Bobango
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Susan Brink
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Kara Coffey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karlie Goodman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reiko Sheridan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Newman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.