Teams

JByrd2-DUR

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.11 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-07-26vs SLlewellyn-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Brett Compton vs Stewart Bible / William Clark1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Allen / David Belcher vs Pearson Wynands / Caleb Lewis6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-16vs JMontague-DURLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Katz / Alex Piasecki vs Charles Gowland / Nikita Poujai4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-12vs JCollins-SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Huang / Jermaine Byrd vs Hyunseong Ahn / William Sendor7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-12vs JMontague-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Jared Ingram vs Patrick Grant / Raymond Xu1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Meske / Alex Piasecki vs Nikita Poujai / Barry Gooch6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Allen / Galen Howlett vs Michael Ratliff / Anthony Womack3-6, 4-6
2026-06-28vs JCollins-SVCWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrett Compton / Jared Ingram vs Theo Buchholtz / William Sendor6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMike Meske / Benjamin Katz vs Will Hausen / Jose Porrua6-1, 6-3
2026-06-21vs SLlewellyn-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesMike Meske / Brett Compton vs Spencer Llewellyn / Michael Weslander6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCameron Burch / Galen Howlett vs Pearson Wynands / Nicholas Mazzoleni6-3, 6-4
2026-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Katz / Vamsee Pasangulapati vs Sanjay Ambardar / Vishal Gupta6-4, 6-3
2026-06-14vs MHanauer.4.5T-DURSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Brett Compton vs Matthew Hanauer / Stephen Holmes7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCameron Burch / David Belcher vs Michael Muller / Michael Young2-6, 6-7
2026-06-07vs JMontague-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesJared Ingram / Mike Meske vs Patrick Grant / Raymond Xu6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Piasecki / Benjamin Katz vs Pradeep Hariharan / Barry Gooch3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Belcher / Daniel Allen vs Anthony Womack / Steve Haine4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-05vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesJared Ingram / Migel Hidalgo Saldana vs Brett Eckles / Herman Gudjonson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Piasecki / Benjamin Katz vs Tevin Wilson / Nick Gilder1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCameron Burch / David Belcher vs Casey Collins / Devohn Vines1-6, 1-6
2026-05-31vs JCollins-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJared Ingram / Brett Compton vs William Sendor / David Cristescu6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMike Meske / Alex Piasecki vs Ganesh Kamath / Stephen Stark6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCameron Burch / Galen Howlett vs Aaron Westrick / Joel Smith6-3, 6-1
2026-05-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesOheneba Boateng / Benjamin Katz vs Charles Gowland / Christopher Lott6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 18 & Over 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JMontague-DUR6216821189
2SLlewellyn-DUR44131125195
3JByrd2-DUR44101429223
4JCollins-SVC1751939258
5MHanauer.4.5T-DUR1751939263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Brett Compton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Jared Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Edmund Malesky
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Mike Meske
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Alex Piasecki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Benjamin Katz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Cameron Burch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Galen Howlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
David Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Migel Hidalgo Saldana + Jared Ingram4452% games+6.7% vs expected
Benjamin Katz + Alex Piasecki4446% games−6.6% vs expected
Cameron Burch + David Belcher224 matchesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Migel Hidalgo Saldana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brett Compton
38W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Jared Ingram
102W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
98W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Edmund Malesky
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
4.06
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Mike Meske
26W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Alex Piasecki
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Benjamin Katz
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Cameron Burch
47W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
Galen Howlett
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Belcher
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.