Teams

CAS.Wallace

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-24vs TOHS.ByrdLost 01
L#3 DoublesDustin Adams / Morten Pedersen vs Eduardo Schlotterhausen / Michael Weslander6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-19vs TOC.XuLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Pinocci / Jeffrey Tabelon vs Ryan Sheppard / Seth Layton2-6, 6-7
2023-07-12vs TOC.TurnerWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Tabelon / Paul Wiegand vs Claude Ruffieux / Srinath Ekkad6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLuivi Valero / Morten Pedersen vs John Doe / Balaji Radhakrishnan7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-14vs PW.MooreWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Pinocci / Jeffrey Tabelon vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Joshua Moore4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-08vs TOC.MorrowLost 01
L#3 DoublesMorten Pedersen / Dustin Adams vs Ryan Goff / Charles Gordon4-6, 3-6
2023-05-30vs TOC.MerckLost 01
L#1 DoublesMic Wallace / William Carter vs John Hankinson / Takumi Kajiwara6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Tabelon / Paul Pinocci vs Kevin Mcdonald / Scott Anderson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Mic Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Todd Garcia
published
3.68
Jeffrey Tabelon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Luivi Valero
published
3.42
J Wright
published
3.32
Dustin Adams
published
3.29
Brett Allan
published 3.5
3.29
Morten Pedersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Paul Wiegand
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

J Wright + Brett Allan4152% gamesnot enough data
Morten Pedersen + Jeffrey Tabelon2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mic Wallace
121W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.38
Todd Garcia
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
4
Jeffrey Tabelon
88W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Luivi Valero
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
J Wright
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Dustin Adams
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brett Allan
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Morten Pedersen
78W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Wiegand
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.