Teams

Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT · M8.0 Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-16vs McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJody Edwards / Craig Waters vs Mark Jett / Gary Paparella7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrent Norris / Dale Ridenour vs Raymond Thoma / Derrick Green6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJonathan Mefferd / Robert Fitzgerald vs David Megert / Mark Farrell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Deleonardis M8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Edwards / Michael Stasiak vs Jae Shim / Atul Rajani0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Lanzone / Chuck Menges vs Kamran Mir / Wei-Bin Lai3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Fitzgerald / Greg Adams vs Ryan Livengood / Muralikrishnan Shanmugam2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M8.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Craig Waters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Chuck Menges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Dale Ridenour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Chris Lanzone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Frederick Cass
published
Greg Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jody Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Mefferd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Stasiak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Salling
published
Robert Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trent Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Waters + Jody Edwards5647% gamesnot enough data
Trent Norris + Robert Fitzgerald123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Waters
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chuck Menges
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dale Ridenour
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Chris Lanzone
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Frederick Cass
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Greg Adams
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jody Edwards
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Mefferd
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Stasiak
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Salling
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Fitzgerald
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trent Norris
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.